Template talk:Recommended order of cleanup templates

Reasoning
This is the order I've been using. Deletion is obviously the most serious, and we want it to stand out even if there are multiple cleanup templates applied. Doing the requested merge may obviate the other issues (e.g., no-intro and stubbiness would no longer apply if merged into a larger article). No-intro should go where the intro would be if the article has one, and I would argue that not having an adequate intro is the most serious of the sorts of flaws that usually result in a cleanup tag being applied. Stubbiness is the least significant issue; Wiki is not paper, so we can afford to let stubs live if they otherwise meet our criteria. 121a0012 05:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)