User:Allixpeeke/journal

Contents
=2014=

January

 * Joined Wikiquote.

December
=2015=

January

 * Kalki requests adminship. Much discussion is had about socks.  Kalki's adminship approved.
 * Cirt thanks me. Cirt writes,"Thank you, Alixpeeke, for your helpful redirects. :) Much appreciated,"

February

 * I create my own sandbox.

April

 * UDScott expresses concern over music categories.
 * I inspired BD2412 to create a page for Friday the 13th.

July

 * Ningauble nominates the following pages for deletion: Honey (disambiguation), Sweetie, Toots, Nut, Chick, Duplex, Chick Island, and Babe. After a discussion at Votes_for_deletion/Honey_(disambiguation), the page is kept (thanks to Honey, Honey, and Honey). BD2412 assisted in the saving of Nut by creating Nut and Nut.  Duplex is saved (thanks to Duplex, Duplex, and Duplex!).  Babe is saved (due to the preëxisting pages Babe Ruth, The Babe, Babe, and Styx). After some discussion (a discussion involving much misunderstanding between Ningauble and me), I retract my keep vote for Chick Island, and it is deleted.  (DanielTom suggests that I am "trying too hard to make Wikiquote mirror Wikipedia.")  The others I also let expire.  (See also discussions and Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:Quotability.)
 * A discussion is had regarding the use of symbols in the QOTD. I do not participate.

August

 * DanielTom and I discuss reviving Romeo + Juliet. We work together to construct a prototype.  I must eventually submit this for recreation.
 * Further QOTD discussion. I do not participate.
 * Further QOTD discussion. I do not participate.

September

 * Further QOTD discussion. I do participate.  Reasonable consensus is reached that there should be one QOTD image per day.  Per UDScott's recommendation, I attempt to begin a discussion on specific language for the policy.  The discussion goes nowhere.
 * Roxycloud thanked me for my edits on Hotline Miami.
 * Peter1c thanked me for my edit on Nyanaponika Thera.
 * Peter1c thanked me for my edit on Sarah Kofman.
 * I create for myself a resources page to be hopefully used in the building of future pages.
 * I save Jim Henson from deletion by adding sources to quotes on the page. Cirt appreciated my improvement.  Cirt and Ningauble have a misunderstanding in the debate.
 * Nangauble nominates Category:People by status for deletion. During discussion, I abstain.  Category is deleted.
 * Nangauble reverted my edits on Category:20th century deaths and Category:21st century deaths, writing,"manual tables are not needed to duplicate the function of MediaWiki category software"

October

 * ABC model of flower development (created by Y-S.Ko) was nominated by UDScott for deletion. After discussion, it survives.
 * Aphaia thanked me for my creation of Saturday.
 * Cirt thanked me for this edit to Jim Henson and this edit to the deletion discussion. (See also User talk:Ningauble, User talk:Rubbish computer, Wikiquote:Administrators' noticeboard, Wikiquote:Village pump, and Talk:Jim Henson.)
 * Aphaia thanked me for my moving Toasting to Deejay.
 * Cirt contributes to the QOTD discussion. Discussion remains nevertheless unfortunately apparently dead.
 * I save Mattin from deletion by editing out the false insinuations that he was a show and adding actual Mattin quotes.
 * I save The Steve Harvey Show from deletion by adding quotes.
 * I save Eve from deletion by adding quotes.
 * I save Girlfriends from deletion by adding quotes.

November

 * DanielTom and I have a discussion about the double-space, which inspires me to do a bit of investigating. The modern tendency toward a single space has nothing to do with typewriters; rather, it was a money-saving device adopted in modern, commercial publishing.
 * UDScott thanked me for my work on creating templates.
 * CensoredScribe and I discuss art. I express the views that it is"prudent to be a tad discerning when categorising things as art or as art movements, for if we don't, we may end up categorising everything as art, thus rendering the category rather unhelpful."
 * CensoredScribe nominates Category:Libertarian films for deletion. In the discussion, UDScott initially votes delete.  (Continued in December.)

December

 * UDScott and I discuss my categorisation of films as libertarian. We come to a reasonable agreement.  UDScott writes,"Thanks Allixpeeke for your thoughtful responses - I think I have a much better understanding of your view - and I admit, you've convinced me on many of your points. I retract my statement that you were trying to stretch an idea to make films fit into the box of Libertarian films. Thanks!"Following the discussion, UDScott changes vote to keep, writing,"after some meaningful discussion at User talk:Allixpeeke, I now do see enough value to keep this category."I vote keep and provide a lengthy response to the discussion addressing every concern listed.  Nobody else alters vote.  Y-S.Ko and CensoredScribe add additional comments.  UDScott changes vote again, saying that although my approach to libertarian themes in films has merit, UDScott was no longer "sure that this category is useful for describing films on this site."  I provide a medium-length response to Y-S.Ko (although I accidentally address the response to CensoredScribe (an error I later fix)).  I provide a lengthy response to CensoredScribe.  (I quote myself when addressing concerns that I had already addressed previously.)  I provide a lengthy response to Y-S.Ko.  No one alters vote.
 * UDScott and I discussed the Category:Journalist films category. We came to a reasonable agreement.  UDScott writes,"I'll just say that yes it is still confusing...but your point is well made and I agree. :-) Feel free to revert my changes. Thanks."
 * In the discussion on whether or not to delete Category:Libertarian films, I provide a brief response, a moderately-lengthy response, and a lengthy response to 50.185.134.48. No one alters vote.

=2016=

January

 * UDScott deletes Category:Cities in Sri Lanka, Category:Cities in Syria, Category:Cities in Chile, and Category:Free Soil Party United States Senators. Reason: "Housekeeping."
 * DanielTom thanked me for my edit in the village pump.
 * In the discussion on whether to delete Category:Libertarian films, per DanielTom's request, I provide a brief, additional response to Y-S.Ko. No one alters vote.  Category is deleted.
 * I request that Category:Anarchist films and Category:Socialist films (both of which I had created along with Category:Libertarian films) be deleted. Both are.
 * CensoredScribe nominates Category:Feminist films for deletion. In the discussion, I vote delete, providing the following rationale:"Normally, I would vote keep for this and similar categories. But since Category:Libertarian films was not deemed suitable by the community, I see no reason why this category would be deemed acceptable, either.  Maybe someday, in future years, opinions will sway, and categories such as these will no longer be viewed as unsuitable.  But, until then, it only makes sense that we be consistent."Category is deleted.
 * UDScott and I discuss the clean-up tag on Alice in Wonderland. We come to a reasonable agreement.  UDScott writes,"You have very reasonably defended your choices and I honestly believe that you may be right that perhaps it is best to leave this page as it is - this page seems to qualify as one that should be an exception to the template. That being said, I do not wish to see all pages deviate from the template and I think it is good that we discussed this case (and should other pages seek to deviate from the template in the future, I would hope similar discussion occurs). Thanks for your thoughts - I will remove the tag."
 * CensoredScribe  thanked me for (1) creating McDonald's, (2) creating Margaret Keane, (3) creating El Greco, (4) creating Walter Keane, (5) creating Alice in Wonderland (1915 film), (6) my edit on Alice in Wonderland (1915 film), (7) my edit on Category:Architects, (8) my edit on Category:Musicians, and (9) my edit on Mutant.
 * CensoredScribe suggests a possible issue with my approach to ordering quotes. I find merit to the suggestion and revise my approach. To summarise: (1) Surname of the author whose surname comes first alphabetically, (2) surname of the person with a "screenplay by" credit whose surname comes first alphabetically, (3) surname of the person with a "written by" credit whose surname comes first alphabetically, (4) surname of the person with a "story by" credit whose surname comes first alphabetically, (5) work title, (6) surname of the character whose surname comes first alphabetically, (7) as "Narrator" (if the character is a narrator), (8) "Unknown," (9) "Anonymous" (if not a character).

March

 * Illegitimate Barrister  thanked me for redirecting D.C. to Washington, D.C.

July

 * Peter1c  thanked me for my edit on her/his talk page.