User talk:110.159.160.235

I reverted the edit you made to the Confucius page, because the statement you added was provided with no indications that it had ever been credibly or incredibly attributed to Confucius. I actually almost blocked you, thinking you were simply a vandal, before examining other edits which simply have some need of format adjustments, because I have been checking in briefly throughout recent days, to check on a spate of vandalism that has recently been occurring, and thought that edit might have been associated with that. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 16:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I again removed the remark with the comment "the link you provide does NOT indicate any anecdote of such remarks as you claim he made — and even if it did the OBVIOUSLY LAME excuses of a politician for his own lame remarks hardly are a widely credible attribution." I do not believe that such an obnoxious comment of a politician obviously being stupid should pollute the Confucius page. IF this was a widely believed attribution it might merit such inclusion — but it is quite obviously NOT that. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 16:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)