User talk:42.111.24.199

Quotes should never be removed without a comment in the edit summary, and should almost always be moved to the Talk page with a note that they were removed from the article, giving full reasoning. If it is a misattribution, the quote should not be removed, instead being moved to a "Misattributed" section, where explanation of the misattribution can be made in a subbullet. Ambedkar was a politcian, politicians get criticized all the time, there is no reason to get upset about it. Just look at any politican article like Donald Trump. Would you think it correct to remove all critical quotes from that article? On top of it, most of your deleted quotes say nice things about Ambedkar!!! I could understand maybe (but it would still be wrong to censor it) if the quotes said bad things about him, but they say nice things! Ambedkar himself often said controversial things on many topics, he himself also had respectful things to say about the likes of Sarvarkar and RSS, so you are not doing honor at all to him by censoring quotes. And the remedy for an overabundance of quotations chosen to reflect positively or negatively on someone or something is to add some which counter this. But thank you for reminding me to making updates to this article, I would never get around to it if nobody would be reminding me like you. --ΞΔΞ (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)