User talk:86.11.227.119

You have been TESTED. There is currently a major investigation being conducted by a consortium of international media to determine whether or not Wikipedia is truly Fair, Unbiased and Compliant even with its own Stated Criteria for Entries. Removal of the following quote: " To suffer any egregious injustice is itself an egregious injustice enough! But to then also suffer being silenced and forced to suffer in silence is not just the ultimate injustice of all, but it is the death of Humanity, whatever little there may be left of it! For Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Speech, provided that one is not threatening to deny the same essential right to any other Human Being, is as essential to a Meaningful and Healthy Life as Clean Air, Water, Soil and the Right To Love and be Loved! " - Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo

is absolute, irrefutable evidence, being collected ( among many, many other examples ) that Wikipedia is indeed possibly being run by persons with sinister motives; such as suppression of ideas, opinions, and facts that would otherwise warrant being placed on Wikipedia.

The person whose words have been published is someone who our consortium considers to be the ultimate 'Yellow Canary' in the 'mine of acts of malicious suppression of ideas, opinions, and facts. He was written up in The New Yorker magazine of August 17, 1987, and before the age of the advent of the public internet, was famous to millions of New Yorkers and others elsewhere in America and throughout the World.

Had you Searched the name of the aforementioned person you would have found sufficient reason to leave the quote in its proper place ( unless, of course, you are deliberately serving a sinister purpose ).

We will be keeping a close eye on your activities from now on; as you appear to have FAILED OUR TEST. Note: we have used plenty of qualifiers in this communication.

CENSORSHIP, especially on a page about CENSORSHIP and FREE SPEECH, is something the whole World should be concerned about, and Wikipedia is deliberately manipulating and slanting, and skewing, the public's view of reality, the World we live in.

When our investigations are concluded we will publish specific details.

July 2013
~ DanielTom (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

You do not yet realise the possible severity of how this may yet reflect on your future credentials. Your response is typical. We have recorded this. Keep in mind this: an abuse of any power that affects the welfare of society in general, of Human Civilisation itself, is likely to be recorded in any future History Books and historical documents. Obviously you will feign ignorance and pretend that you are entitled to abuse the power you hold. The days when Wikipedia can continue to exist the way it currently does are numbered. If Wikipedia is to survive it must not be as vulnerable to persons with sinister motives/purposes. You are at risk of proving yourself to be an enemy of truth, of freedom, of humanity. Think about it.


 * I don't have any more "power" than you have. And this is Wikiquote, not Wikipedia. You are welcome to add well-sourced quotes of notable people to our articles, and contribute to Wikiquote in a positive way, but you are not welcome to vandalize my user page with your persecution mania nonsense. Think about it. ~ DanielTom (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikiquote is part of the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikimedia is also responsible for Wikipedia. In terms of who you are to Wikiquote and Wikipedia it makes no difference. Nor does it make any difference in terms of our media consortium's investigation. As we predicted: you will feign ignorance and continue to abuse your power. In the general public's eye you may ( Note: the qualifier; "may" ) have to face a tribunal after possible prosecution as part of what appears to be a sinister set of cabals that may or may not be directly linked to one-another. You will also feign ignorance towards this particular response, and for your false sense of comfort continue to abuse your power. The right thing would be for you to do your research about who the mentioned individual, whose quote you so unethically removed, is! We advise you to do so without further hesitation. We are interested in only one thing: exposing abuses of the general public's rights by sinister entities who manipulate electronic media.


 * Mr. Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo does not have a page at Wikipedia, so there are concerns that he may not be notable enough to appear on Wikiquote. Even ignoring that, you added a quote by him with Facebook as the source. That is obviously not acceptable. If his quote is all that notable (which it doesn't seem to be), you should be able to find a reliable, independent source that cited it (say, a reputable newspaper). Finally, you should not be hinting at a legal threat, otherwise you could get yourself blocked here. (It's not me who is going to block you. I'm just a regular editor like you, not an admin. But there is a line that you shouldn't cross.) ~ DanielTom (talk) 12:10, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Recorded.


 * A few notes here: (1) Notability of this person was assessed at Wikipedia (by open discussion, not by cabal) with negative result. No new evidence of notability has been offered. (2) Facebook is a free speech site, where this sort of material is entirely appropriate. Wikiquote is not a free speech site, it is a compendium of notable quotes, where this sort of material is not appropriate. Take it somewhere else. (3) Whatever your "consortium" wants to do is not our concern. Threatening comments about it are not acceptable. ~ Ningauble (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)