User talk:Billinghurst

Hi, I don't know if you recognize me, I have communicated with you IIRC on Wikisource & Mediawiki. I'm here because I tried unintentionally to add a note to your recent comment on Meta. Just want to make a note that the reason I ended up on X's META TP is that I wanted to ask them about  someone they nominated for a global lock, was carried away forgetting that I was not editing an enWQ page where, thankfully, I am (still?) not indef-blocked.. This is getting confusing, so lets move on.. You were talking to User:x about their reverting changes on the  TP of some wiki-functionary, and I was just wondering if this is not a more general problem. I myself hate it when comments made by a some-users on my OWN TP are reverted by a third party, especially since the is usually followed by an edit war. I hope I am making sense?

Note: I will attempt to come back later to turn redlinks into blue ones, with your permission Ottawahitech (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, you have seemed to get yourself into a bit of trouble. I am aware of the issue of which you mention, and I think that you can see my opinion. Typically, unless it his highly abusive, significantly problematic/systematic, or completely out of scope, I think that most things should be left to the user of whose talk page. I mean I did myself revert a user's contribution so I am not going to stand all high and mighty about it. — billinghurst  sDrewth  09:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Excuse me but why you created this?
Excuese me, but you created a page as Quw:User talk:Billinghurst, can you tell me why you created this page? Lemonaka (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * please delete it. It is in error, and was meant to be at q:guw: I wondered where I had mucked up and why the page hadn't appeared. :-/ — billinghurst  sDrewth  02:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ speedy as test page. Lemonaka (talk) 04:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quw:User talk:Billinghurst
I have added a "" template to the article Quw:User talk:Billinghurst, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikiquote is not" and Wikiquote's deletion policy).

You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Votes for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DeirgeDeltac 07:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry .. hadn't spotted Lemonaka had dealt with this first before I started the PROD. -- DeirgeDeltac 07:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)