User talk:Jackerson

Starscream
I have added a "" template to the article Starscream, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikiquote is not" and Wikiquote's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Votes for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Ningauble 13:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Since you are contesting the proposed deletion, I have put it to a vote. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Votes for deletion/Starscream. Thank you. ~ Ningauble 12:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Your posts to Administrators'_noticeboard are disruptive. Please stop. Cirt (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Disruptive posting

Blocked
Blocked for disruptive editing at WQ:AN. Cirt (talk) 11:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Another warning
~ UDScott 00:29, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Final warning
"I do the same thing: Put pages up for deletion like you guys to get even with you."

I'm tired of seeing you rail against the deletion process with weak arguments. I just rolled back four edits of yours; keep disrupting Wikiquote and you'll find yourself indefinitely blocked. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 04:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

And I'm tired of you threatening innocent users and putting delete on VFD pages like the Starscream page. Maybe you are the one who is not worthy of being an admin here.(Jackerson 04:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
 * I'm not threatening an innocent user; I'm telling a disruptive editor what the consequences of their actions will be. Believe it or not, I don't want to block you, but won't hesitate if you can't refrain from disrupting the project. If you come up with legitimate reasons to delete an article, by all means, use the deletion process; I won't hinder you in any way, shape, or form. But prodding articles just because Starscream is being considered for deletion? Unacceptable. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 04:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I think its time to delete old pages like Adolf Hitler and replace them with new ones otherwise these admins are not worthy of being admins because of their acts of keeping racist articles.(Jackerson 05:01, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
 * Disliking the topic of an article is not a valid reason for deletion. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh Yeah? Well if you really want something deleted I say how about delete all the articles off the wiki? Here is several reasons why:


 * The articles have no notable quotes or memorial ones


 * Most of the pages are a mess and didn't have any cleanup


 * Most of the pages are never trimmed especially the Lenin page


 * The Pages all fail Manuel of Style


 * The admins are not worthy of being admins because they did not get rid of the Dictator related pages


 * The pages especially the Adolf Hitler page are offensive and spammish


 * This one is payback for the Starscream page that you put up for deletion


 * The pages are all disruptive like the George Bush page


 * Finally the articles are harmful and might destroy the wiki if you don't delete them soon

(Jackerson 05:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC))

Just.. stop. Find another website. You're making ludicrous claims and are obviously grinding an axe about Starscream being deleted; why are you even here? You obviously don't like our policies, so just find another website to edit. Please, I don't want to block you, but your disruption of the site needs to stop, one way or another. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what are you talking about disrupting the wiki and I didn't say I do not like your policies. Final of all every pages are violating the Manuel of Style you guys installed on the wiki.(Jackerson 05:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
 * Rather than just call for the deletion of every page on the project, how about you tell me a couple of articles that violate our Manual of Style? Better yet, how about you work on improving the articles instead? EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler, Lenin, Saddam and any page that talks about dictators are violating Manual of Style.(Jackerson 05:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC))
 * Please point to where in the Manual of Style it says that we can't have articles about dictators. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

You know where it is so stop quit asking and start deleting. If you block me then that means nothing will change and the website will get worst instead of better. I am putting Adolf Hitler, Lenin and Saddam up for deletion to escape my sorrow not trying to sacrifice admins.(Jackerson 05:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)) If you put any article up for deletion without valid reason, you'll be blocked indefinitely. You've been given ample warning. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it isn't in our Manual of Style, which is why I was asking you to point out where.

ENOUGH! The time has come for several bad pages to get deleted and final of all it is time to get rid of the old and replace them with the new because ALL PAGES ARE A MESS!(Jackerson 05:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC))

Blocked indefinitely
For disruption after multiple warnings. Cirt (talk) 16:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)