User talk:Randall Dale Chipkar

Hi, welcome to English Wikiquote. Enjoy! ~ Ningauble 16:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote.
 * See also What Wikiquote is not for common activities that Wikiquote does not support.
 * To ask for help or to talk with another editor, visit our Village pump.
 * To browse Wikiquote, take a look at our browsing start page.
 * Before creating new articles, consult our guide. You may practice how to edit a page at Sandbox.
 * Please remember to use edit summaries when editing pages.
 * When posting to a discussion, please sign with a date by writing four tildes (~&#126;) and saving.
 * Be bold.

Randall Dale Chipkar
I have added a "" template to the article Randall Dale Chipkar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikiquote is not" and Wikiquote's deletion policy).

You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Votes for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Ningauble 16:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, you should probably rethink your user page at User:Randall Dale Chipkar. Wikiquote user pages exist to facilitate communication among participants in the project, not to host substantial content that is unrelated to Wikiquote. Wikiquote is NOT a venue for advertising or promoting one's books or products, so your user page may be nominated for deletion if it is not substantially rewritten into something appropriate for Wikiquote. ~ Ningauble 16:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments as I had misunderstood the format. I have made the appropriate revisions on the website pages herein. Note that my controversial book has also received worldwide support since its release. Ulterior-motive skeptical blogs create confusion rather than concern. Some blogs present inaccurate information generating comments that thrive upon member self-amusement regardless of important issues. Conquering cancer requires our utmost attention concerning any potential cancer causation, cancer-growth promotion or cancer medication disruption. My book is self-explanatory and the Wikiquote page presents relevant quotes from my published work. You can preview my book on Amazon Kindle Chipkar. - User:Randall Dale Chipkar.


 * Thanks for reworking your user page. The Randall Dale Chipkar article has been listed at Votes for deletion. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Votes for deletion/Randall Dale Chipkar. You may want to review Wikipedia's general notability and conflict of interest guidelines before commenting. Thank you. ~ Ningauble 14:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision has been made.

For proper clarity, certain comment wording requires editing. The referenced blog simply posts mere opinions and inaccurate statements from a self-proclaimed skeptic blog author who has never read my book at all. I respect this talk page is not a blog, however, I must state that the emerging health effects of non-ionizing energies are well documented. The facts presented in my book and website cannot be ignored. I accept the article deletion based upon misunderstanding Wikiquote’s conflict of interest terms and not based upon an ulterior-motive blog author. There was no book review by this person. It is relevant that the inappropriate “book review” wording and related blog link reference should also be removed for Wikiquote clarity and integrity. It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.User:Randall Dale Chipkar 05:03, 28 January 2012}}


 * The point of the link was to show that the book has received some notice. Had Dunning published in Skeptic magazine itself rather than its blog, then it would have counted as significant evidence of notability. Of relevance for Wikiquote is that the choice of venue is suggestive of having deemed the book insufficiently notable for the pages of the magazine. The lede paragraph clearly indicates his subject is the book, so I do not accept that describing it as a "book review" is inappropriate. Wikiquote is neutral about whether the views expressed in the book or the blog are correct; and this is not the place to discuss it. ~ Ningauble 17:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)