V. Gordon Childe



Vere Gordon Childe (14 April 1892 – 19 October 1957) was an Australian archaeologist who specialised in the study of European prehistory. He spent most of his life in the United Kingdom, working as an academic for the University of Edinburgh and then the Institute of Archaeology, London, and wrote twenty-six books during his career. Initially an early proponent of culture-historical archaeology, he later became the first exponent of Marxist archaeology in the Western world.

Quotes

 * Not only are they (the theories of racial anthropology] worthless; they are mischievous. They have induced their votaries to postulate all sorts of migrations, for which there are as yet not a particle of evidence. To but­ tress the Nordic s claim to be the ruling race p a r excellence, attempts have been made, and are still being made, to prove that the earliest dynasties of China, Sumer, and Egypt were established by invaders from Europe and even today the vision of certain prehistorians is absolutely distorted by this preconception. Such misdirected enthusiasm also injures science in another way. The apotheosis of the Nordics has been linked to the policies of imperialism and world domination: the word "Aryan” has become the watchword of dangerous factions and especially of the more brutal and blatant forms of anti-Semitism. Indeed the neglect and discredit into which the study of Indo-European philology has fallen in England are very largely attributable to a legitimate reaction against the extravagancies of Houston Stewart Chamberlain and his ilk, and the gravest objection to the word Aryan is its association with pogroms.(287)
 * quoted in Arvidsson, Stefan (2006), Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science, translated by Sonia Wichmann, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.


 * By the end of the fourth millennium B.C. the material culture of Abydos, Ur, or Mohenjo-daro would stand comparison with that of Periclean Athens or of any medieval town. . . . Judging by the domestic architecture, the seal-cutting, and the grace of the pottery, the Indus civilization was ahead of the Babylonian at the beginning of the third millennium (ca. 3000 B.C.). But that was a late phase of the Indian culture; it may have enjoyed no less lead in earlier times. Were then the innovations and discoveries that characterize proto-Sumerian civilization not native developments on Babylonian soil, but the results of Indian inspiration? If so, had the Sumerians themselves come from the Indus, or at least from regions in its immediate sphere of influence?”
 * Quoted in    Durant, Will (1963). Our Oriental heritage. New York: Simon & Schuster.


 * The simplest explanation of the presence of a Centum language in Central Asia would be to regard it as the last survivor of an original Asiatic Aryan stock. To identify a wandering of Aryans across Turkestan from Europe in a relatively late historical period is frankly difficult.
 * (CHILDE 1926:95-996). The Aryans: A study of Indo-European Origins. Childe, V. Gordon. Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & co. Ltd., London, 1926.


 * But as a whole they [Kassites] were not Aryans. Though they adopted the Babylonian language and culture, the local scribes  have recorded the Kassite names for god, star, heaven, wind, man,  foot, etc. ; not one of these is in the least Indo-European. Moreover,  the majority of the personal names of the period ...  suggest rather a kinship between the Kassites and the Asianic folk  to the north-west. Yet in the names of their kings occur elements  recalling Indo-Iranian deities — SuriaS (Sun-god cf . Sans. Surya) IndaS  (cf. Sans. Indra)y MaruttaS (cf. Sans. Mantiah, storm-gods) and  -bugaS (cf. Iran, baga, god). Moreover, these Kassites introduced  the use of the horse for drawing chariots into the Ancient East and  its later Babylonian name sitsu seems to be derived from the Indo-  Iranian form ^asm (Sans. aim). It is then highly probable that  the Kassite invasion was due to the pressure of Aryan tribes on the  highlands of Iran, and that its leaders were actually Aryan princes.
 * Childe, The Aryans. quoted in Talageri, The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism (1993)


 * (The Hittite language) cannot be accepted without qualification as Aryan. ... The deviations in the inflection are puzzlingly numerous. ... Again the number of Indo-European words and stems identified in the  vocabulary is but small. Finally, the syntax remains essentially un- Aryan... Now if these documents dated from the 14th century AD, few would hesitate to declare that they were written in an Indo-European language  and explain the discrepancies as due to the familiar  phenomena of decay, assimilation of forms, and foreign borrowing.  But the texts... are many centuries older than the oldest written memorials of Sanskrit or Greek. Yet their language diverges from the hypothetical original Aryan tongue far more than Greek or Sanskrit differs from the parent speech or from one another. It is a fact impossible to believe that a truly Indo-European language would look so odd in the 14th century before our era.
 * Childe, The Aryans. quoted in S. Talageri, The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism (1993)


 * These [Mitanni] numerals and divine and personal names are the oldest actual specimens of any Aryan speech which we possess. The  forms deserve special attention. They are already quite distinctly  Satem forms ; in fact, they are very nearly pure Indic. Certainly  they are much more nearly akin to Sanskrit than to any of the  Iranian dialects that later constituted the western wing of the Indo-Iranian family. Thus among the deities Nasatya is the Sanskrit  form as opposed to the Zend Naonhaitya and all the four gods are  prominent in the oldest Veda, while in the Iranian Avesta they have  been degraded to secondary rank (Mithra), converted into demons  (Indra) or renamed (Varuna =Ahura Mazda). The numerals are  distinctively Indic not Iranian ; aika is identical with the Sanskrit  eka while ' one ’ in Zend is aeva. So the s is preserved in Satta  where it becomes h in Iranian (hapta) and the exact form is found,  not indeed in Sanskrit, but in the Prakrits which were supposed to  be post-Vedic.  Even the personal names look Indic rather than Iranian. Thus  Biridaswa has been plausibly compared with the Sanskrit Brhadasva (owning a great horse). If this be right the second  element, asva, horse, is in contrast to the Iranian form aspa seen in Old Persian and Zend. ... Finally we know that there existed among the Mitanni  at this time a class of warriors styled maryanni which has suggested  comparison with the Sanskrit marya young men, heroes.
 * Childe, The Aryans. quoted in S. Talageri, The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism (1993)


 * No multiplication of weapons of war and battle‐scenes attests futile conflicts between city‐ states as in Babylonia nor yet the force whereby a single king, as in Egypt, achieved by conquest internal peace and warded off jealous nomads by constant preparedness … The visitor inevitably gets an impression of a democratic bourgeois economy, as in Crete, in contrast to the obviously centralized theocracies and monarchies hitherto described. (Childe, quoted in Wheeler, 1955: 191)
 * quoted in Michel Danino, in : Walimbe, S. R., & Schug, G. R. (2016). A companion to South Asia in the past. chapter 13. Aryans and the Indus Civilization: Archaeological, Skeletal, and Molecular Evidence
 * Wheeler REM. 1955. Still digging: interleaves from an antiquary notebook. London: Michael Joseph.


 * [l]anguage, albeit an abstraction, is yet a more subtle and pervasive criterion of individuality than the culture-group formed by comparing flints and potsherds or the “races” of the skull-measurer. . . . they [the Aryans] must have possessed a certain spiritual unity reflected in and conditioned by their community of speech. To their linguistic heirs they bequeathed, if not skull types and bodily characteristics, at least something of this more subtle and precious, spiritual identity. . . . The Indo-European languages and their presumed parent-speech have been throughout exceptionally delicate and flexible instruments of thought. They were almost unique, for instance, in possessing a substantive verb and at least a rudimentary machinery for building subordinate clauses that might express conceptual relations in a chain of ratiocination. It follows then that the Aryans must have been gifted with exceptional mental endowments, if not in enjoyment of a high material culture. (p. 4)
 * quoted in Jean-Paul Demoule - The Indo-Europeans_ Archaeology, Language, Race, and the Search for the Origins of the West


 * How precisely did the Aryans achieve all this? It was not through the superiority of their material culture. We have rejected the idea that a particular genius resided in the conformation of Nordic skulls. We do so with all the more confidence that, by the time the Aryan genius found its true expression in Greece and Rome, the pure Nordic strain had been for the most part absorbed in the Mediterranean substratum: the lasting gift bequeathed by the Aryans to the conquered peoples was neither a higher material culture nor a superior physique, but that which we mentioned in the first chapter—a more excellent language and the mentality it generated. . . . At the same time the fact that the first Aryans were Nordics was not without importance. The physical qualities of that stock did enable them by the bare fact of superior strength to conquer even more advanced peoples and so to impose their language on areas from which their bodily type has almost completely vanished. This is the truth underlying the panegyrics of the Germanists: the Nordics’ superiority in physique fitted them to be vehicles of a superior language. (pp. 211–212)
 * quoted in Jean-Paul Demoule - The Indo-Europeans_ Archaeology, Language, Race, and the Search for the Origins of the West