Victorian era

In the history of the United Kingdom, the Victorian era was the period of Queen Victoria's reign, from 20 June 1837 until her death on 22 January 1901. The era followed the Georgian period and preceded the Edwardian period, and its later half overlaps with the first part of the Belle Époque era of Continental Europe.

Quotes

 * One thing that strikes me when I think of Booth is the nonsense that is talked today about the poverty of the Victorian age. Why the Victorian age is so unpopular today very largely arises from the fact that, in spite of all its faults, there was among its great men, who were numerous, a faith in goodness: there was a moral earnestness and there was a sense of duty and a performance of duty.
 * Stanley Baldwin, speech to the Salvation Army William Booth Centenary Celebrations, London (10 April 1929), quoted in This Torch of Freedom (1935), pp. 106-107


 * It is in the connection of the conflict with the Yankee...that we can perhaps best understand the South's unusual proneness to sentimentality. The root of the thing, obviously, was in the simple man... It was part and parcel, in fact, with his unrealism and romanticism, and grew as they grew. It gathered force, too, from the Zeitgeist, of course—from the great tide of sentimentality which, rolling up slowly through the years following the French Revolution, broke over the Western world in flooding fullness with the accession of Victoria to the throne of England. Nowhere, indeed, did this Victorianism, with its false feeling, its excessive nicety, its will to the denial of the ugly, find more sympathetic acceptance than in the South.
 * W. J. Cash, The Mind of the South (1941; 1991), p. 82
 * The colonisation of Australia and New Zealand, and the acquisition of South Africa in the decline of Holland, created the new and wider British Empire still based upon sea-power and comprising a fifth of the human race, over which Queen Victoria, in the longest reign of British history, presided. In this period moral issues arising from Christian ethics became prominent. The slave trade, from which Britain had so shamelessly profited in the past, was suppressed by the Royal Navy. By a terrible internal struggle, at the cost of nearly a million lives, slavery was extirpated from the United States; above all, the Union was preserved.
 * Winston Churchill, A History of the English-Speaking Peoples Volume IV: The Great Democracies (1958), p. ix


 * During the last half of the 19th century there was a marked fall in the crime rate with a substantial decrease in both crimes of dishonesty and violence, and in the illegitimacy rate, and the beginnings of a fall in the incidence of drug and alcohol abuse. It was a period of striking moral reform in personal behaviour which transformed Britain from being a violent, dishonest and addicted society into a peaceable, law-abiding, respectable and essentially moral realm that endured for much of the 20th century.
 * Christie Davies, 'Moralization and Demoralization: A Moral Explanation for Changes in Crime, Disorder and Social Problems', in Digby Anderson (ed.), The Loss of Virtue: Moral Confusion and Social Disorder in Britain and America (1992), p. 3


 * British rates of recorded crime fell as markedly in the latter part of the 19th century as they have risen since. The overall incidence of serious offences recorded by the police in the 1890s was only about 60 per cent of what it had been in the 1850s and, given that the efficiency of the reporting and recording of crime was improving at the time, the real fall in the crime rate was probably far greater than that indicated by official statistics. Thus in 1900 Britain was not only a less violent and dishonest country than today, but also less violent and dishonest than it had been in the earlier part of the 19th century.
 * Christie Davies, 'Moralization and Demoralization: A Moral Explanation for Changes in Crime, Disorder and Social Problems', in Digby Anderson (ed.), The Loss of Virtue: Moral Confusion and Social Disorder in Britain and America (1992), p. 5


 * [A]n earlier generation of Britons succeeded in changing the character of their people and producing a diminution in the many forms of deviance that have reappeared and flourished in our own time, because they saw them as constituting not a social but a moral problem whose solution lay in the reform of personal conduct. One key agency in spreading and transmitting Gorer's "strict conscience and self-control" from being "a feature of a relatively small part of the population" to becoming "general throughout nearly the whole of society" was the Sunday school whose enrolments rose as the incidence of deviant behaviour fell in the late 19th century. Significantly, the numbers enrolled in and the influence of this institution then fell in the years prior to the reversal of the U-curve of deviance which has produced Britain's present high level of moral problems. There seems to be a clear inverse relationship between the rise and fall of the Sunday school...and the fall and rise of deviant behaviour.
 * Christie Davies, 'Moralization and Demoralization: A Moral Explanation for Changes in Crime, Disorder and Social Problems', in Digby Anderson (ed.), The Loss of Virtue: Moral Confusion and Social Disorder in Britain and America (1992), p. 10


 * The postulate that there was a link of some kind between the rise of the Sunday school and the original decline of deviance is reinforced by the geographical evidence as well as the aggregate changes over time. Wales, which historically had been one of the more violent and lawless parts of Britain, became in the later 19th century an especially peaceable and law-abiding place, characterised by temperance and a strict moral code.
 * Christie Davies, 'Moralization and Demoralization: A Moral Explanation for Changes in Crime, Disorder and Social Problems', in Digby Anderson (ed.), The Loss of Virtue: Moral Confusion and Social Disorder in Britain and America (1992), p. 10


 * No one will ever understand Victorian England who does not appreciate that among highly civilized...countries it was one of the most religious that the world has known. Moreover its particular type of Christianity laid a peculiarly direct emphasis upon conduct; for, though it recognized both grace and faith as essentials to salvation, it was in practice also very largely a doctrine of salvation by works. This type, which had come to dominate churchmen and nonconformists alike, may be called, using the term in a broad sense, evangelicalism... [I]t became after Queen Victoria's marriage practically the religion of the court, and gripped all ranks and conditions of society. After Melbourne's departure it inspired nearly every front-rank public man, save Palmerston, for four decades... [N]othing is more remarkable than the way in which evangelicalism in the broader sense overleaped sectarian barriers and pervaded men of all creeds... Even Disraeli, by nature as remote from it as Palmerston, paid every deference to it in politics, and conformed to all its externals in Hughenden church.
 * Robert Ensor, England 1870–1914 (1936), p. 137


 * The gentleman of the nineteenth century had broken, once Victorianism loomed on the horizon, with the wild and liberalistic vagaries of his forefathers. His background was frequently middle class and in England it was the influence of the Low Church which molded his type. He was deadly afraid to be different. On the Continent it was compulsory military service and in England the public school which fostered the herd instinct. To be different was treason and indecency. The religious principles of old were replaced by taboos. The return to primitive society had begun.
 * Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Liberty or Equality (1952), p. 73
 * Victorian historians too often depicted the past as an inevitable progress leading to the glorious present when Britain ruled the world. And French and German and Russian and American historians did much the same thing for their nations’ stories. Like epic poems, their books were filled with heroes and villains and stirring events. Such histories, says Michael Howard, the eminent British historian, sustain us in difficult times, but they are “nursery history.”
 * Margaret MacMillan, The Uses and Abuses of History (2008), p. 39


 * Take another look at the graph showing illegitimacy from the 1500s up to the present, and focus on the period from 1850–1900. It would be hard to find a time or place in which industrialisation and urbanisation were faster, more sweeping, or more wrenching than in Victorian England. And yet during that same period, illegitimacy went down, not up (crime also dropped, amazingly). The Victorian middle class was superbly efficient at propagating its values throughout society, and its success overcame the naturally disruptive forces of modernisation.
 * Charles Murray, Underclass: The Crisis Deepens (1994), pp. 9-10


 * Now the Victorian Age, or the nineteenth century as a whole, was a great moral reformer... It proclaimed that men, even courtiers and noblemen, ought not to be drunken or dissolute or even corrupt, that politics were really concerned with the welfare of the people, that the rich had duties towards the poor. The transition from George IV and his unpleasing brothers to the young Queen and the Prince Consort was typical of a much wider change. When Lord Palmerston was caught chasing a maid of honour into her bedroom, the excuse made for him was: "Your Majesty should remember that he is a very old gentleman and accustomed to the manners of the late Court".
 * Gilbert Murray, 'The Civilization of the Nineteenth Century: Its Greatness and the Flaw which led to its Collapse', The Ordeal of This Generation: The War, the League and the Future (1929), p. 43


 * There was a re-birth of public spirit. Gentlemen ceased to take bribes. Justice became incorruptible... It has been observed that up to about 1820 the laws passed by Parliament had almost all been for the protection of the privileged few against the many; after that time they are predominantly for the protection of the nation as a whole against abuse and privilege. Instead of the ferocious defence of property, a spirit of sympathy and help to the oppressed begins to inspire legislation. The old revolutionary doctrine of the infinite perfectibility of mankind, which had set on fire the enthusiasm of Godwin, Shelley and Condorcet, passed in a milder and more reasonable form into the general imagination of the age.
 * Gilbert Murray, 'The Civilization of the Nineteenth Century: Its Greatness and the Flaw which led to its Collapse', The Ordeal of This Generation: The War, the League and the Future (1929), p. 44


 * Whether or no man might be made perfect, he certainly might be made better and happier than he is; and the conscious pursuit of that object became an accepted source of inspiration to politics and literature. With it went the conception that the necessary condition of the pursuit was freedom: set man free, let him have room to move and external conditions which do not starve or cramp him, and human nature of itself will strive to rise higher. This spirit shows itself in almost all the best English fiction of the period, from romantics like the Brontës, and realists, like George Eliot, to satirists, like Dickens and Thackeray. It had been utterly lacking in Fielding and Smollett, and even in Jane Austen. It shows itself in the immense increase of charitable institutions, of religious missions, of societies for the education of the people. There is no question of hypocrisy. To suppose there is, is the mere petulance of jealously. Shelley's or Gladstone's love of moral improvement was just as genuine as Falstaff's love of sack. But an age of moral earnestness seems in our own day to have been succeeded by an age of relaxation; and one can see in, for instance, such a book as Mr. Strachey's Eminent Victorians that the moral earnestness of Gladstone or Dr. Arnold is felt by the author to be a hateful quality and not easily to be forgiven.
 * Gilbert Murray, 'The Civilization of the Nineteenth Century: Its Greatness and the Flaw which led to its Collapse', The Ordeal of This Generation: The War, the League and the Future (1929), pp. 45-46


 * [T]he Victorian Age... cared more for life than for thought; consequently it produced abundant and fine life, while its thought was comparatively unambitious and aimed mainly at serving the practical purposes of life. It cared intensely for morals and little for metaphysics; a good deal for religion and scarcely at all for theology... It had an immense faith, a faith in goodness, in duty, in the future of mankind.
 * Gilbert Murray, 'The Civilization of the Nineteenth Century: Its Greatness and the Flaw which led to its Collapse', The Ordeal of This Generation: The War, the League and the Future (1929), p. 51


 * Between 1780 and 1850 the English ceased to be one of the most aggressive, brutal, rowdy, outspoken, riotous, cruel and bloodthirsty nations in the world and became one of the most inhibited, polite, orderly, tender-minded, prudish and hypocritical.
 * Harold Perkin, The Origins of Modern English Society (1969), p. 280

Mary Stocks: Well it could happen. You see, it did in the first half of the nineteenth century, didn't it? When there was a reaction against the sort of extreme libertarianism of the late eighteenth century.
 * Audrey Russell: Do you think that there may be a reversal and that certain very strict standards may suddenly follow the present age?
 * Frankly Speaking, BBC Home Service (July 1964)


 * When I speak of Victorian values, I mean respect for the individual, thrift, initiative, a sense of personal responsibility, respect for others and their property, and all the other values that characterised the best of the Victorian era.
 * Margaret Thatcher, letter to John Evans (5 May 1983)


 * I had great regard for the Victorians for many reasons – not least their civic spirit to which the increase in voluntary and charitable societies and the great buildings and endowments of our cities pay eloquent tribute. I never felt uneasy about praising ‘Victorian values’ or – the phrase I originally used – ‘Victorian virtues’, not least because they were by no means just Victorian. But the Victorians also had away of talking which summed up what we were now rediscovering – they distinguished between the ‘deserving’ and the ‘undeserving poor’.
 * Margaret Thatcher, The Downing Street Years (1993), p. 627