Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Akshay Makadiya

BD2412 T 05:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Akshay Makadiya
Spam and self advertise— Kabirkhan22 (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 11:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - I couldn't find anything wrong with the information he added, enough citation from the legit and Notable sources.
 * — 43.241.145.140 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep - Sounds Legitimate Haisebhai (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * — Haisebhai (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete. Not remotely notable. Web posts at a handful of vanity sites with no editorial oversight do not make someone a journalist, and a user group with no affiliation is just a fan club. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. I disagree that this article covers a non-notable entity. Those are not just vanity sites like The Huffington Post and YourStory are renowned media sites with a vast editorial oversight. The page is updated and additional sources added as per the cleanup tags added last month but the article should not be deleted. — Axymakofficial (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment – (1) Since January 2018 HuffPost ended the practice of publishing posts from unpaid bloggers, and this author's single post there bears the following disclaimer right on the page: "This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email." (2) All four of the author's posts at YourStory bear the following disclaimer right on the page "This is a YourStory community post, written by one of our readers. The images and content in this post belong to their respective owners. If you feel that any content posted here is a violation of your copyright, please write to us at mystory@yourstory.com and we will take it down. There has been no commercial exchange by YourStory for the publication of this article." (3) Notability of this person is not demonstrated by using sites that disavow responsibility for his self-posting. Notability could be demonstrated if there is significant coverage about him in reliable sources that are independent of him. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Reply - (1 & 2) It's been a long since there's a no update on Huffpost and Yourstory as there's no longer affiliated with them. (3) Here are some links that show the notability of the person demonstrated using sites that disallow for his self-posting.
 * Google - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-psH4Xno3NHFTG6Ygi7PTQwFP7QsuBZZ/view?usp=sharing You can find the print media coverage of the story on the official website.
 * https://yourstory.com/mystory/135405a6ff-how-a-personal-diary-writer-published-2-books-in-quick-session-
 * https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/news/performance-based-marketing-in-crypto-prospects-best-practices/
 * http://gardividyapith.ac.in/assets/Pages/PS/GARDI%20TIMES/2018/GARDI%20TIMES%20FEBRUARY-2018.pdf
 * https://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/milf-44-hundreds-tattoos-including-21854241
 * https://www.cryptoanalyst.co/2017/12/20/india-launching-crypto-crackdown-firms-big-time-users-crosshairs/
 * https://blockpublisher.com/bitcoin-price-controlling-factors-that-are-crucial-to-understand/
 * https://ko.0xzx.com/2019081222308.html
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20130624011259/http://bloggingzene.com/askshay-makadiya-interview-whatismyresults-com/
 * https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-29360950
 * https://therift.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Virtual-Drivers-of-Real-Growth_EUs-Complex-Tax-Policy-Strategy.pdf


 * Keep. The notability of a person is established by the existence of corresponding links and articles. Dassu92128 (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * — Dassu92128 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * keep. I think the person doesn’t have a Wikipedia and it needs to be cleaned up to remove all the extra quotes that aren’t notable, but there’s nothing wrong with the articles as a whole. Praspeaks (talk) 05:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * — Praspeaks (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete. Spam page The item does not meet notability requirements. Self advertise and fake users votes User:Dassu92128, User:Praspeaks, User:Axymakofficial and User:Haisebhai .Kabirkhan22 (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Dear Kabirkhan22, why are you so desperate man? You already requested to delete the page and as a part of the process, we are here. I don't know about those accounts but certainly, your account is a sockpuppet account created to report this page and vandalism.
 * Delete per nom, and unnotable. Whoever is (quite obviously) canvassing, this is about community consensus and is not a majority vote. Blatant sock/meatpuppetry. Category:Suspected Wikiquote sockpuppets of Haisebhai contain the ones I've found. dibbydib (T · C) Project Stub 01:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Pinging admins and  for faster consensus on potential sockpuppetry dibbydib (T · C)  Project Stub 01:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment

The user Kabirkhan22, who flagged the page as Spam and self advertise is a sock puppet account personally targeting the page. I've got a list of proof to prove his vandalism.

1. The vandal is trying to delete all the records present on wiki including wiki data. Check the revision history of the page - Q91833255, The Vandal has used his sock puppet accounts to defame and tried to delete the page by more than SIX times.

2. Here is the list of sock puppet accounts he used, just to delete the page. You won't find a single contribution from these accounts apart removing the content.
 * 2405:205:140A:A22A:89FD:30AE:7626:4DF4
 * 2405:205:140A:A22A:0:0:496:78A4
 * 2409:4052:68C:8E9F:0:0:16F6:58A5
 * 157.47.128.110
 * 2409:4052:2E8D:1560:B494:50D0:B401:A23A
 * 2409:4052:2308:C002:5064:B557:A3FB:2101

3. Apart from this, I tried to find the location of those accounts, and here is the report that clearly reveals the intention of the reporter. (Click on IP to know to find detailed information.)

4. The above reasons clearly indicate that it was an attempt to delete the page and he succeeds in taking the page down, misguiding the admins, and wasting the time. 5. Surprisingly, at the time of writing this message, again, he tried to delete the content of page Q91833255 after admin blocked me, so I can't restore the page. Furthermore, he is trying to reach out to other administrators and asking to delete the page. It clearly indicates how desperate he is. It is my humble request to restore the page and lock it so he can't edit the same from another IP. Thank you again.

UPDATE (April 27)- Despite the warning by on the Q91833255, The spammer has again started his vandalism on the page. with the (2405:205:140a:a22a:c09a:c15f:44bb:314) same GEO Location he deleted the site links and Reporting to Admin like a kid. Could you please help me to get rid of this Vandal. UPDATE - The IP added the advertising spam template is a part of this sockpuppet accounts. Please check the Geolocation and ISP of the reporter IP - ‎ (2405:205:140a:a22a:c09a:c15f:44bb:314) - It is the same as all previous IPs. All the IPs mentioned above are used to report my account nothing else. So please consider is personal defamation and took appropriate actions.

'''I already reported this to, and. NO RESPONSE.'''
 * Pinging Editor admins  and  for faster consensus on potential sockpuppetry

To this definitely smells fishy but I don't know that CU or blocking is necessary at this juncture. Just note that your !votes above are very weak and unconvincing, so unless something dramatic happens in the next few days, this will definitely be deleted. If you are the same person, please cease using multiple accounts. If you are separate individuals who have an interested in actually contributing here, this is probably not the best entry to get started. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * One, two, three, four Ah, the rare sock war. Can definitely confirm that both of these are using sock(/meat)puppets based on contribution dates and that barely any of them have even close to 5 or more edits. Also ping isn't working for me. dibbydib (T · C) Project Stub 21:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)