Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Ascolo Parodoticus

Ascolo Parodoticus
This has already been speedy deleted twice. The quotes seem to come from this self-published web page: where they are attributed to Ascolo Parodites not Ascolo Parodoticus.— Ole.Holm 16:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 17:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't expect me to acquiesce to your meaningless and contrived definitions of notoriety and fame: quality of the quote, I daresay quotability of the quote should be your standard, which may or may not be inversely proportional to the degree it has become famous. The casual internet denizen's brilliant improvisation of the 'deez' joke- by no means am I saying something like that should be granted in the main index of the site. But these quotes I have personally worked on and translated from an original manuscript passed down, among other books and relics, through my family. I think they deserve a wider audience than could be granted to them through my posting on random internet philosophy boards or through what would need to be an original publication. But more fundamentally: it comes down to an easy way/hard way deal. You can take some time to ponder my scholastic improvements to your standards here, try to understand my motivations and earnest desire to expand your knowledge-base on wikiquote- as opposed to a vacant desire to propagate a personal ideology or interest.... Or I can re-create the page every time it is wiped clean, and when I am IP-banned, I can one after the other get my endless supply of internet associates to use their addresses to re-post it as is.
 * If your quotes have any value, you'll be able to get them published by a reputable publishing house, which will establish their sourceability for our purposes, and may cause the quotes to become sufficiently notable as well. BD2412 T 04:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As for the above comment, don't expect us to be impressed by a combination of "earnest desire to expand [our] knowledge" and senseless, extortionist threats. - InvisibleSun 03:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412 T 04:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails manuel of style, spam, poorly written, no memorial or notable quotes and finally pointless.(StarWarsFanBoy 01:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC))
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 18:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)