Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Big Mori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 07:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Big Mori
Lack of notability — —This unsigned comment is by Changerinwiki (talk • contribs). Vote closes: 13:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Re-added to Votes for deletion since this page was erroneously archived without being closed first. * Pppery * it has begun 02:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: English Wikipedia article w:Big Mori was w:WP:CSDed with "(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)" while d:Q106044767 seems to have most/all on-identifier references simply imported from enWQ by a bot which makes them minimal quality in this circumstance. I was going to vote delete but I have not checked some of the references and to be certain of voting delete I would also need to do extensive check on the enWP. I've therefore elected to recuse to comment in the process of writing this.  -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 18:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: this discussion has been good faith disrupted and I suggest a noconsensus close with no object to re-nominate after a week.  I would expect the article creator  to have been informed by the nom. rather than a transient IP which was the case. Payamkermanshahi was not informed of the re-presentation of an expired VfD either.I realise this is a chain of good faith mistakes but I'd suggest leaving a week and then giving a clean VFD nomination at that point. I am also minded that while Payamkermanshahi contested the PROD they did so my adding references and those were not initially challenged after those additions..  The corresponding article on the English Wikipedia was deleted on a W:WP:G11 (Speedy delete: unabiguous advertising and promotion) and my best (and it is pretty flimsy)interpretation of the indicators is that was not put through AfC and was deleted from mainspace prior to curation by NPP. I have to AGF the G11 was valid and it probably was, maybe (95%+) chance in my view but I retain a nagging possibility of doubt on that.  As such this needs to be closed no-consensus or alteratively let run for 7 days after Payamkermanshahi has been informed. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 13:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, lack of notability; self-promotion per preceding comments. Markjoseph125 (talk) 02:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.