Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Boolean templates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 04:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Various Boolean templates

 * Template:Booland
 * Template:Booleq/eq2
 * Template:Booleq
 * Template:Boolnand
 * Template:Boolne
 * Template:Boolnot
 * Template:Boolor
 * Template:Boolxnor
 * Template:Boolxor
 * Template:Boolean Templates/truetable
 * Category:Boolean templates

Various unused Boolean templates and one category created a long time ago. Also these features can be done by using parser functions if they are needed anywhere. — WOSlinker (talk) 21:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

OR:
 * Vote closes: 22:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Is it as easy to use parser functions as these templates?--Abramsky (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Well you would still have to use a parser functions even if you used any of these template anyway, for example

vs

AND:

vs


 * As a side note, these were all removed from Wikipeida in 2007 -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This system is a hopeless Rube Goldberg based on the way MediaWiki templates default unused parameters. Please also delete the underlying qif template, and Boolnor which was omitted above. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, if unused, without prejudice in the future if they become useful. -- Cirt (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)