Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Category:1850s births

--Poetlister 23:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:1850s births
We don't usually have birth categories; if we did, we'd have 19th century births to match deaths. — Yehudi 14:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 15:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Delete. I don't think it would hurt us to have century-of-birth categories, to match our century-of-death categories, but we need not get mare specific than the century until we are up into the 1900s. BD2412 T 16:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete We should have a discussion some time on birth categories, but this jumps the gun.--Poetlister 16:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 15:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 *  Keep  When I was a child, I used to think (19th century)=(1900s). I won't squabble about this; therefore, if others insist on deleting this category, then so be it.--Inesculent 03:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but at the moment we don't have birth categories at all. Undoubtedly we could change all of the existing death categories to, e.g. 1800s deaths instead of 19th century deaths to alleviate that sort of confusion, but that still would not necessitate splitting the century by decades. BD2412 T 04:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Since we don't have yet, then I we should delete this one.--Inesculent 05:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom and above discussion. ~ UDScott 15:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously as we don't yet have other birth categories.--Cato 22:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)