Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Category:ImageMovers films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: DELETE. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 16:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:ImageMovers films
Again, a much too narrow category. I can see having some categories of films by studio, but only for the major, well-known ones - and this does not meet that criterion. — UDScott 01:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 02:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. ~ UDScott 01:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing very notable or Memorial, pointless, fails Manuel of Style, offensive page, contains spam, poorly written and violates Blocking Policy.(StarWarsFanBoy 02:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC))
 * Delete I see a consensus to delete Regency Films and this is less worthy of keeping than that.--Ole.Holm 10:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, along with Category:Random House books. ~ Ningauble 15:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.