Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Category:Midquel films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 14:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Midquel films
This category, based on a neologism for a species of sequel, does not have any utility for characterizing or organizing quotations. There may or may not be some value in using Category:Sequel films to flag derivative works or follow-on products; but I see no value in subcategorizing quotes from works according to sequential narrative order. — Ningauble 18:40, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 19:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. Identifying related works in the introduction is a good thing. This categorization is superfluous. ~ Ningauble 18:40, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 00:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no one is going to be burning to find quotes from all the works that happen to be "midquels". BD2412 T 17:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a helpful concept, and not a widely used word that I can see.--Collingwood 15:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, though agree with regarding utility of sequel films category. -- Cirt (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)