Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Category:Wikiquote sockpuppets of BarkingFish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 17:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wikiquote sockpuppets of BarkingFish
Let us not import Wikipedia sockpuppet investigations and results here, which has nothing to do with Wikiquote, see also Administrators%27_noticeboard — Mdd (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 23:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutral: I object to calling these accounts Wikiquote sockpuppets — where is the evidence that they were ever used to "attempt to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards and policies" at Wikiquote? There is no evidence of that whatsoever. Take a look at their contributions: those accounts have exactly zero edits on this project. (Sometime during my life, "account with no edits" became "sockpuppet". I wasn't notified of this. No one asked me if I agreed with it. It just happened.) ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unnecessary here. BD2412 T 00:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. They have all been technically ✅ as sockpuppets. -- Cirt (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, Cirt used a ✓, so it must be true! Too long have we been deceived by these malicious zero-edit accounts, but no more! ~ DanielTom (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The malicious sarcasm is not helpful here. -- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there any reason that when you click on the tick, it displays a cat picture? -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That depends on what you consider to be "malicious", Cirt. I for one prefer sarcasm over accusing others of sock-puppetry with no evidence whatsoever. ~ DanielTom (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. I don't see the need for this unless such activity were to occur here. ~ UDScott (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's not import the sort of drama that puts me off editing WP. This place is usually much more civilised.--Abramsky (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)