Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Chanda Hahn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted. BD2412 T 14:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Chanda Hahn
This self-published author does not appear to be sufficiently notable for a Wikiquote article. (Contested prod.)— UDScott (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 21:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, as nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't delete. Two of writer's books have recently appeared in Barnes and Nobles top 100 selling books.  AcrosstheLitVerse (talk) 00:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. A short Google search revealed no notable coverage by any websites outside of the usual blogs & booksellers, but if you really tried, Hahn might be able to slide past our notability restrictions. She has graced a few bestseller lists & such. The major problem in my opinion is that none of the quotes on the page are fully, properly sourced. That makes it worthy of deletion. Nick1372 (talk) 03:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Now that the quotes have mostly been sourced, I'll change my opinion to a weak keep, if only because UDScott's argument has a few merits. Nick1372 (talk) 02:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't find any evidence of actual editorial reviews in notable sources, nor evidence that anyone notable actually quotes this stuff. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.