Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Daniel Brandt

__NOINDEX__

Daniel Brandt
Non-notable individual, and a person who has explicitly stated that they'd rather not have biographical articles on WMF projects. Let's please do the decent thing here — Alis o n  ❤ 22:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 23:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom - Alis o n  ❤ 22:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's have some respect here and delete this page (also delete:, , , , , ). This should apply to anyone who is not well-known that does not desire a biography, in my opinion. And he is definitely not notable. His biography at English Wikipedia is already deleted, so why keep this here? Jonas Rand 22:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Daniel who? RMHED 22:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per, also nothing appears to exist at Daniel Brandt. Cirt (talk) 23:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator Ripberger 23:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is possibly Poetlister/Cato/Yehudi/Bedivere/etc. See his votes for that user twice (as Cato and as Poetlister), being welcomed by that user, "retiring" in the wake of that scandal, and never identifying himself as another user on any other wikis. I am not saying that this invalidates the vote, but I would appreciate it if this is revealed and he edits openly as saying that he is that person. Jonas Rand 23:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note I am not Poetlister or a sock of anyone. Please take this to AN, Checkuser, or the appropriate forum if you feel I am an unauthorized alternate account.  Thank you. Ripberger 00:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No abusive sock is proven.--Jusjih 00:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 00:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. rootology (T ) 01:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per this subject's many efforts to remove his name from Wikimedia Foundation projects. Subject has gone through several legitimate Wikimedia processes to remove his name from WMF pages. Keeping this page may only exacerbate an uncomfortable situation for a person whose notability is questionable. Firsfron 07:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Quotes involving Wikipolitics aren't notable. - InvisibleSun 16:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per InvisibleSun. Also, wikiomphaloskepsis should be cleaned up in articles about notable people too. Wikidrama does not belong in article space. ~ Ningauble 17:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, or else. ;-) -- Thekohser 19:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Or else what? :) ++Lar: t/c 20:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Or else the Pittsburgh Penguins get it. -- Thekohser 17:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * do the right thing delete ++Lar: t/c 20:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: And perhaps import en.wiki's Snowball clause (if you all don't have your own flavor already)? --MZMcBride 21:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Poetlister. Hive Minder 12:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Note to closing admin: Please see comments on Talk.--Reviewer 11:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)