Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/David DePape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: '''delete. --Saroj Uprety (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2023 (UTC)'''.

David DePape
Concerns over lack of notability. No associated English article though there is currently a redirect. Categories on that direct indicate possible promotionalism concernes. Questioning if Quotes themselves are significant.— User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 13:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Vote closes: 14:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC).
 * Comment: While I agree that this person is likely not worth having a page, the event that occurred (the attack on Paul Pelosi) is a notable event. Maybe this page should be redirected to a page about that event and additional quotes can be found. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: (as nom.) I'm only vaguely aware of the incident, but note policy WQ:QLP applies in a case like this not only to a perpetrator but also to any victim and I need a need not to overtly promote a victimiser in such cases or give them undue if any prominence on a victim's page, and that may be a precautionary reason specifically not to redirect/merge. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 00:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * redirect: I just spotted (or an least realised the significance of) a redirect on enWQ and that was sufficient for me to create d:Q116786368 which I've sitelinked. Unfortunately with my understanding I cannot currently link that Wikidata item to an English Wikipedia redirect (a newishly introduced feature) as my understanding of the required procedure is that it requires someone not blocked on enWQ as I am.  While I believe the redirect is appropriate I remain concerned the platforming of individual over a victim may be inappropriate on WQ:QLP basis so I believe a blanket merge is inappropriate but that is a tricky argument to navigate. -- Djm-leighpark(a)talk
 * Delete per nom. BD2412 T 02:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.