Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Elena Ospina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: no consensus for any action. BD2412 T 02:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Elena Ospina
Lack of notability including no associated article on the English Wikipedia — User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 06:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Vote closes: 07:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Neutral: Delete: (As nom.) -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 06:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Because of sources (I think I (As my alt account Deirge) seen on ProQuest (and it was a quick glance and my Spanish is not great) I don't feel maintaining a delete votes this one so I'm swung to neutral As it stands article should not stay here, but to remain the onus is on those who wish to keep to improve the article with cited content that improves representation of notability. But if it isn't improved or the associated enWQ article incarnated it should be (soft) deleted. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 23:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pragmatically moving to keep for my own mental and physical safety. My alt Deirge has created & sitelinked a Wikidata item after confirming "OPEN WINDOW. (2012, 03). New Internationalist,, 54. Retrieved from.  Also Deirge found per "Dibujando por la paz", humor gráfico para cambiar el mundo: VIÑETAS PLANTU. (2011, May 23). EFE News Service we could even have "La libertad siempre ha estado amenazada, y existe una permanente autocensura en todos los medios de comunicación. La corrección política y la libertad de expresión son una combinación difícil" as a quote. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 06:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: I think both wikipedia and wikiquote will be better when male artists aren't represented so much more than female artists. Would be nice if there was a way to make sure most of the people voting on something like this are women. Some about her background and awards she's won: https://www.irancartoon.com/site/artists/elena-ospina. Sorry if I format this incorrectly, this kind of page is new to me - User:A23423413 15:24, 6 January 2023
 * @: My understanding is enWikiquote inclusion/exclusion criteria is gender neutral and I am reasonably sure most people identifying as males on will not specifically vote against articles with women as subjects, in fact I'd suggest there might be a very slight bias in the opposite direction due to systemic bias in sources/(candidate-article)population. Even if Ospina is notable the important thing is the enWikiquote article demonstrates/prepresents it.  That's fairly automatic if there is a link to an enWikipedia article that has persisted (stayed around in mainspace more that just fleetingly with unresolved notability tags).  Otherwise it should need a brief high quality article summary stating notability aspects of the subject using independent w:WP:RS sources which should indicate the notability aspects of the subject.  Any award worth its salt should probably link to an enWikipedia article, it might just be a industry or COI local award. Simplely stating a person is a female "Colombian painter, illustrator and cartoonist." does not in itself indicate notability.  Pulling some info into the biography at the Link-rottable bare URL you've mentioned would be helpful albeit that's not helpful.  My alt account Deirge has access to [The Wikipedia Library] (I've confirmed in my case my indef block was not an issue) and believe Proquest there has some possibly useful references you might be interested in for this subject. In fact just looking at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/James P. Walsh which is a useful study the article might be suffering from a "lack of representation of notability" rather than a "lack of notability", either of which should lead to delete.  Hope this helps a little. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 12:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: (As nom.) Markjoseph125 (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.