Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Firestorm (anime)

~ Ningauble (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Firestorm (anime)
While "Firestorm" does appear to be a real anime, the article doesn't have any useful content, isn't wikified, and doesn't even contain quotes from the anime. While it could possibly be expanded and wikified by another editor, I'm not sure about this article's notability and I don't believe it is worth keeping the current article since it has no valuable information on it. — GeorgeBarnick (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 22:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd tag it for speedy deletion with the rationale "no quotes". ~ DanielTom (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I was initially going to do that, but I figured it is a page that could have quotes if anyone could expand it, but should be deleted if it doesn't get expanded. Should I change it to speedy? --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Some time has passed and the creator of the page still hasn't added quotes, so it's safe to assume it will stay as it is. Perhaps an admin can now delete it and close this discussion. ~ DanielTom (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'll change it to speedy deletion. --GeorgeBarnick (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Although the language at WQ:SD calls for speedy deletion for "no content" only when there is "neither an introduction to the topic nor any quote" (which is consistent Wikipedia's approach, that if a topic is notable it may be presumed that a minimal stub has some value and should be kept until it is expanded with more substance), it has been the customary practice for several years at Wikiquote to speedily delete articles with no quotes. The policy, written many years ago, has not been updated to reflect the practice. ~ Ningauble (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2014 (UTC)