Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Frany Dejota

Frany Dejota
Article was previously PRODDED and deprodded by the creator, who, given their activity and choice of username, likely has an external conflict of interest and may be using this page as a form of advertising. The English Wikipedia article was deleted two years ago after a slew of socks showed up at the deletion discussion trying to defend the article. All the sources I'm seeing are all just run-of-the-mill online coverage you might expect from any moderately successful local garage band: Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud, Discogs, etc. Not a single reliable secondary source exists that I can tell, or if there is, then it's hiding quite well. That the author has also filled the Commons category with low quality selfies further suggests that this is mostly just COI spam/advertising. —  G M G  talk  13:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 14:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep These pages are not promotional or spam, they are about a real artist and not invented. The information is neutral and verifiable, they are not linked in any official website of the artist or are being promoted in any way. It is not a crime for a user to upload only information about an artist, musician, actor, writer or public figure. Wikimedia is not Wikipedia, in Commons you accept images that you have created entirely by yourself, as long as your image is not a replica of a work with restricted rights. They accept images that represent people or objects and all the artist's images uploaded to Commons are freely authorized and are in the public domain. Not biting newbies is a norm, instead of eliminating articles, collaborate in nourishing them and providing neutral information to expand the projects in Wikimedia. A Wikidata can not be eliminated lightly if it is a real person and his profession is real and verifiable, thank you. per nom. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Managerfdj, in considering whether an article should be deleted, the question is not whether the article should be improved; it is whether the article can be improved. There does not appear to be basically any reliable secondary published sources about this person with which to write an article, either on Wikipedia or here. If this is the case, then it is not appropriate for them to have an article at this time, and will not be appropriate until such coverage is available. If the individual does not qualify for an article on any project, then the images on Common are essentially just low quality personal photographs, and are not within the scope of the project. Similarly, the subject would not meet the notability criteria for Wikidata either and a page on Wikidata would serve essentially no purpose.  G M G  talk  17:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * GreenMeansGo Let's wait a few months and look for more information, the same then there are secondary publications that qualify, for example in Allmusic or other websites that can endorse the artist and the article in Wikiquote and to be able to create an article in good conditions in Wikipedia with your collaboration and the of others. I say why this artist was not on many websites and now he is. The wikidata is used to transfer data to the search panel in google of the person and facilitate web indexing, it would be helpful to keep it. Help me and find quality photographs of the artist to upload them to Commons. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * We do not retain articles on non-notable subjects on the chance that they will eventually become notable. If, in the future, he receives sustained in-depth coverage in reliable published sources, then an article may at that point be written.  G M G  talk  18:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * GreenMeansGo The artist DJ Many was also removed from his Wikipedia for lack of notability, but he still retains his on Commons category and his Wikidata: Q23761366 ¿They keep some artists and others do not and they are deleted? That yes is a conflict of interest between administrators... If you do not delete the DJ Many category and wikidata, I am opposed to eliminating the categorie on Commons, the page on Commons and the wikidata of the artist. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:DJ Many.  G M G  talk  22:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * G M G talk  Perfect, well done. Searching the web, I found an interview reference and press release: Interview in Valencia News I think I read on Wikipedia that the press references and references in AllMusic are valid. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 2:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep This article has quotes from the artist, it is admirable, a great work. per nom. ~ 37.221.237.246 (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Obvious sock is obvious.  G M G  talk  14:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep It does not have wikipedia but it is artist notable, there are many famous in Spain without wikipedia, they are valid sources. ~ 162.243.129.128 (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Blatant promotion, it is obvious that User:Managerfdj is abusing Wikidata, Wikiquote and Commons crosswiki for promotional purposes that are clearly out of project scope. Frany Dejota has been deleted. A global block will follow if this behavior goes on. --Achim55 (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, it appears this has also been twice created on the Spanish Wikipedia, indefinitely create protected, and the creator blocked. As Achim pointed out on Commons, this is probably sock-puppetry by the globally locked Frangaspar.  G M G  talk  16:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Achim55 We already know that the artist does not have wikipedia Frany Dejota that's why I had said to  G M G  talk  in my first statement, it already says that we wait a few months if the artist applies to have a wikipedia, but one of you would have to do it because the page is protected. I also do not see that it is promotional, you would have to provide evidence before saying it and accusing, the artist does not refer at any time to Commons, Wikidata or this article for any of its official accounts... do not accuse the artist or me without proof, false accusations are a crime, also the artist has presence with verified accounts in Google, Spotify, Rakuten Viber, Shazam, Askfm... etz, verified accounts are given to people who are notable and famous, thanks. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Managerfdj, as one can see at your user contributions you made by now 378 edits (including uploads) all of which have been about Frany Dejota, nothing else. I say that's an ongoing effort of promoting a person. And thus one can doubt that your intention is to improve our encyclopedic projects. And be sure: You are not the first one. Every week we have to deal with 'famous' artists, DJs, youtubers and rappers. It looks like you are walking to the next Wikipedia project if a page about Frany Dejota has been deleted on the previous one. Will simple be your next try? --Achim55 (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Achim55 I am new and that is why I hesitate with my actions, but it has nothing to do with contributing only to an artist at the moment, the texts are neutral and do not give any kind of marketing or promotion. I plan to contribute to many more projects of artists, musicians, actors... upload photographs that fall within the law and do not infringe anyone's copyright, improve projects that are already created in commons, wikidata or wikiquote. In completing many incomplete wikidata celebrity projects and linking them correctly to each other to provide the reader with the correct information, it is a wikipedia standard. My method is to search for information and review incomplete celebrity sites and complete them correctly, if they do not have a category, create it, but always with the same celebrity until you see that your pages are correctly and linked to the wikipedia regulations. Little by little, one person after another person and never all at once since it is a great research task and many hours of work to do it. That's why I want to keep my work created in this artist in wikiquote, commons and wikidata. In wikiquote, they ask that the page be linked and indexed with other pages and that it be, it is also with wikidata and it has real and verifiable references, a press reference it has it, meets the minimum requirements and I have never read in Wikipedia it states that it is obligatory to link wikiquote with wikipedia. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to argue the point with you any further. But if you cast another obvious sock vote in this VfD I'm going to block you for sockpuppetry.  G M G  talk  20:51, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm quite curious why you're referring to yourself in third person as if you are not Frany. You claim to be just a fan and yet you uploaded a dozen selfies of Frany Dejota as your own work. So, which is it? Praxidicae (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * G M G  - talk  Achim55 Reliable sources WP refs are valid according to Wikipedia ~ Managerfdj (talk) 12:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * delete and salt. Per nom and xwiki vanity spamming. Praxidicae (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * G M G talk  I have spoken with a wikipedia administrator and librarian in Spanish of my city and he has told me not to create any wikipedia page about this artist. The corresponding references should appear in the Google news section; In the future, if the artist meets all the requirements, you must unlock the page in wikipedia in English and in wikipedia in Spanish to create it, your or me. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The idea that Dejota remotely meets notability guidelines is ridiculous. Hiàn (talk) 21:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hiàn At least it has pages and verified works. ¿How many pages do have you? You surely you will never apply, yes, you will never you. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hiàn When the artist is suitable for all projects in wikipedia, you will be the one who creates your pages, so we will all have embarrassment towards you after your statements. ~ Managerfdj (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Ouch, that really hurts anon. Don't waste my time please (it may do you some good to actually address the notability concerns rather than attack the users that have voted in favour of deleting, eh?). Hiàn (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Jianhui67 (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)