Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Igor Ogirko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 22:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Igor Ogirko
Doesn't have the potential for a proper wikiquote entry, so far just a random quote from one article with no clear relevance. The person himself does not seem to have any outstanding merits. Possibly vanity entry.< — Johannes Rohr 19:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 20:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking at the version history this clearly is a vanity entry, because the main author is called Ogirko Igor Vali'ovich, the same in all other language editions. This persion seems to suffer from extreme narcissism... --Johannes Rohr 20:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. An unquotable quote. BD2412 T 20:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The original article reeked of bogosity, whether due to naive hagiography, plagiaristic vanity, or bald-faced hoax. The quote in the current revised article reads like something from the abstract or introduction of an academic paper. Whether or not such paper was groundbreaking in its field, the statement lacks any quotability whatsoever. ~ Ningauble 17:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - all in all per nom I think. -- Herby talk thyme 18:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 18:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)