Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Image:Old goat-ms.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete.  Cbrown1023  talk  16:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Old goat-ms.jpg
Another image without license info, used only on a userpage. The user who uploaded it was active in 2004 and not mail reachable. It might be his own work, or not. But we have no way to know it. --Aphaia 12:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closed: 13:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I love this pic though ... --Aphaia 12:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to uncertain copyright status. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 14:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * On investigation the user has a Wikipedia webpage with the same image (w:Image:Old_goat-ms.jpg) which is there credited to Mike Bonsall with a note that the photographer has released rights to it. He has been active in Wikipedia in January 2007 - perhaps he should be contacted there? Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 14:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that is enough information for us, now we can tag it the same (it does seem that they are the same person and if not, I doubt the impostor would diagree).  Cbrown1023  talk  15:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if there are no rights being held then it should be uploaded to Commons. Koweja 14:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, concur with Koweja. ~ UDScott 15:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Koweja. - InvisibleSun 06:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I accept the reasoning with regret, as it's sweet.--Poetlister 14:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sweet?--Cato 22:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the image's license status can be definitively determined. —LrdChaos (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per LrdChaos--Cato 22:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.