Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Immanuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete.--Collingwood (talk) 07:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Immanuel
This is basically a single quote page, beefed up with a non-quoteworthy passage of analysis, directed at an overly narrow topic. — BD2412 T 13:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 14:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Nom presents a very good case.--Collingwood (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article seems to represent a POV dispute about something perceived by some to be a burning issue; but the quoted commentary on that dispute lacks quotability. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)