Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/James May


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. BD2412 T 01:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

James May
This was initially listed for PROD, for unsourced quotes (with one sourced quote that is not memorable). After the tag was removed, I am listing it here, because I happen to agree with the original nomination. — UDScott 00:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 01:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. ~ UDScott 00:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412 T 02:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - InvisibleSun 03:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Cirt (talk) 04:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. ~ The C of E is back! 19:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Give it time to be sorced and sorted, instead of just going by a "its a new unsorced artical, DELETE IT!" policy. Give it at least 2 weeks before posting a deletion notice, thats all I ask
 * I'd rather have new unsourced info be deleted now than to have unsourced info wait here longer... and I found no sources, so I don't think it would be any use anyway. RyanCross @ 22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has been around since May of 2007; how is giving it another two weeks going to solve the issue? EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 15:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. RyanCross @ 22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I gave it the prod, and have not changed my mind. ~ Ningauble 03:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.