Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Jude Law

Nominator changed his vote from delete to keep, so we could consider this a withdrawn nomination, I suppose. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 18:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Jude Law
This article contains one unremarkable quote by, and many complementary but unoriginal remarks about this person. Nothing here is the least bit witty, pithy, wise, eloquent, or poignant. — Ningauble 14:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 15:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I think the article can be kept now that I've pruned it. (really no way for me to say that without sounding a bit like a self-centered jackass). EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 06:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Only one of the quotes, by Po-Chih Leong, attempts thematic insight. If we keep that one and the Law quote, can we cling to the slippery slope above the echoing abyss of fanity? ~ Ningauble 17:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Too dumbstruck by the wonderfulness of it all to say anything articulate.  ~ Ningauble 14:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as pruned. Keep the weed-whacker handy. ~ Ningauble 16:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 15:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesomeness Delete He's so great, I don't think we can handle him here. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 16:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, the person himself could use a Wikiquote page, but the current version is not appropriate, per above. Cirt (talk) 08:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not crazy about it, but not inclined to vote to delete it quite yet either. We have no policy on when it is appropriate to have a quote page that is primarily about an individual (and I feel that we should have such a policy). BD2412 T 01:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep unless we get a policy to forbid a quote page that is primarily about an individual.--Jusjih 14:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Most of these quotes were previously removed as "unremarkable" but reverted by a single-purpose account who added more of the same, hence this nomination for discussion. While a good Theme article about a person is not beyond the realm of possibility, I think a policy for such themes should hold them to a high standard: not everything said about a notable subject is quoteworthy.
 * I'd be comfortable keeping the article if it was reduced to just those two. So comfortable, in fact, that I'm going to purge the page now. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 15:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per EVula's improvements. - InvisibleSun 22:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)