Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Kung Fu Panda: Secrets of the Scroll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: '''keep. The page has been expanded with quotes and notability has been established. --Saroj Uprety (talk) 05:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)'''.

Kung Fu Panda: Secrets of the Scroll
Unaddressed, unsummarised, undiscussed contested no quotes Prod by anon ip. plus no demonstration of notability or verificabiity — DeirgeDeltac 19:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Vote closes: 20:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Recused: Delete: (nominator) - unless all problems above addressed. To be clear that if an non permanent anon IP is unable to co-operatively address a prod then I don't trust and script excepts added unless referenced by an in-source location. -- DeirgeDeltac 19:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Recusing per my comment below. -- DeirgeDeltac 08:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete for having no quotes. ~ UDScott (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * delete: Origin nominator for PROD, but removed by IP user. Lemonaka (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Recused: IP seemed to build up the content, maybe wait for a while.--Lemonaka (talk) 20:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't delete!: Please don't delete this page! That movie is about to expire from Netflix. We need it to stay so people can remember the quotes from this movie. 199.243.11.161 20:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Per their talk page this IP has removed the VfD tag for a second time after a VFDremove1 notice was issues for the first time. This is avoidance vandalism and wastes community time sorting it out. It also indicates likelihood even if blocked the IP would return under a different IP and disrespect the VfD process and recreate the article without going through the DRV process after a deletion discussion. I therefore request that, if deleted, this article is salted to force a DRV if it is felt a recreation is required. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDeltac 20:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Markjoseph125 (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't delete: Isn't this vote closed already? 199.243.11.161 19:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @199.243.11.161 Hello, but sorry, you cannot cast two votes on one VFD. Lemonaka (talk) 02:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: creator 199.243.11.161 has disruptively removed the VfD notice and disruptively !voted here twice. They have as Lemonaka has said added a expanded the article but have also added a link to the Wikipedia article which is critical from a notability viewpoint; removing the VfD in the same edit.  I've only been through to look at this again because of a recent clear out of the closed listings from the VfD list has made looking at this practical. The failure to handle this disruption and VfD efficiently and the lack of an apology from the creator means I am spitting feathers. Because I am annoyed with the failure to handle this I am recusing my vote which means I will no longer participate in this VfD. -- DeirgeDeltac 08:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.