Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/LEGO Exo-Force


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: no consensus to delete. BD2412 T 23:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

LEGO Exo-Force
Non-notable webcomic from a product promotion website. Devoid of quotability.— Ningauble (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 14:00, 17 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not much discussion; extending for another seven days to allow more.--Collingwood (talk) 12:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not yet sure how to respond to this one - I actually disagree that it is devoid of quotability and the Dialogue section contains a few decent ones. But the argument regarding the notability of the source and whether or not it is really promotional material has more merit. I am inclined to keep it, but will consider a bit more. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree that one or two quotations have some merit. A borderline decision, though I am more likely to end up voting delete than keep.--Collingwood (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply: I am not seeing the quotabilty that you two are. Granted, there are one or two dialog snips that rise above the level of being completely vapid. Nevertheless, I don't see anything that rises above the level of uninspired hack writing that would never, under any circumstances I can imagine, appear in something like Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. I know we include a lot of weak and unoriginal material from the "vast wasteland" of television because of its irresistible ubiquity; but please, let's not do the same for other marketing venues. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)