Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Lehi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Lehi
In my impression, it would be more fittable to --Aphaia 03:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Wikisource (specially the latter part). Aphaia 08:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 09:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Transwiki to enwikisource --Aphaia 08:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, already deleted per Votes for deletion archive/Lehi (group). It's not exactly the same content, but suffers from all the same flaws as the original: large tracts instead of pithy quotes, possible copyright infringement, possible POV issue. What's new is that this copy is about 90% material taken straight out of Lehi (group), which is why it reads like an encyclopedia article. If someone can confirm (with cited evidence) that this is not a copyvio, I might switch to "transwiki". The last such request failed. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Jeffq. ~ UDScott 15:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It reproduces material in extenso; this seems inappropriate to a site for quotations. I'd like to see this somewhere.--Poetlister 18:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is so little difference between this page and the WP article that its existence here is superfluous. - InvisibleSun 23:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jeff Q. Just about different enough for me not to speedy it as a recreation. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Thanks JeffQ for pointing the past discussion. It could be speedied as "repost of deleting articles", I don't oppose someone to speedied it and close this discussion. --Aphaia 03:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The content seems different enough that I don't feel comfortable speedy-deleting it as a recreation, though. —LrdChaos (talk) 14:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but trim--Cato 22:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.