Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Michael pardalos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete. --FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 17:21, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Michael pardalos
This article was prod (twice) because "No sourced quotes." The tag was removed (twice) without curing the defect, which brings it here. Despite a presence on social networking and user contribution websites, a search of Google News archives indicates this person is not sufficiently notable to have received notice in reliable sources. — Ningauble 14:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 15:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble 14:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 15:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No independent sourcing to indicate the significance of the quotes presented. BD2412 T 12:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.