Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Mock the Week (second nomination)

--Abramsky (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Mock the Week
This title was previously deleted pursuant to Votes for deletion/Mock the Week because contributors could not restrain themselves from adding an overabundance of copyrighted material. The problem persists in this recreated article. Quotability is also a concern because the show consists primarily of silly, mocking ephemera of no enduring interest for a compendium of quotations. The article has also become a magnet for silly lads to make up their own mockery, or "things we'd like to see on Mock the Week". — Ningauble (talk) 16:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 17:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. NoseNuggets (talk) 3:55 PM US EDT Oct 5 2013.
 * Delete Massive amounts of non-notable quotes that are amounting to a huge copyright violation. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 20:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As said, it's mostly copyrighted and numerous times have I had to remove some quotes or change them because someone just wants to add what they want to say. Yoshi58724 (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, per prior precedent at Votes for deletion/Mock the Week, which was then apparently ignored. -- Cirt (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * At it took a couple of years after it was deleted before it was recreated. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 02:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve I don't find anything truly notible in this article. But, I don't see any reason to delete it, either. WIth some improvements this could become a featured article. --Jdaniels15 (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikiquote doesn't have a featured article system. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)