Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Naturalism

BD2412's views deserve respect but he's a minority of one.--Cato 21:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Naturalism
Complete source details have never been provided, all know a notable subject, there are various topics on Naturalism and it doesn't just cover one topic — McNoddy 12:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 13:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, expand, and disambiguate as necessary. It could be said that most any area of philosophy covers a variety of topics, and we can elucidate the breadth of such a philosophy. BD2412 T 15:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a nonsense article. A naturalist usually means a student of natural history or a field biologist.--Yehudi 17:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has a disambiguation page on Naturalism which is mostly focused on two broad themes, one being the philosophy that everything can be proven to be part of nature (akin to secularism) and the other being environmentalism. Someone might look for one or the other on Wikiquote, so I suggest at least a disambiguation page. BD2412 T 19:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Beebe quote is already on the William Beebe page, and it is about naturalists, not naturalism. If someone wants to add an intro and some other quotes to the page, we can talk about what it should be called then, but to my mind we should delete the current page and start from scratch if and when someone wants to do that. --Ubiquity 21:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't put it better than Ubiquity.--Cato 22:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 14:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ubiquity. - InvisibleSun 21:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ubiquity, and because there isn't anything sufficient to keep the page. Lots needs to be added in order to even go for a weak keep. - Zarbon 05:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)