Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Neel Burton

EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 19:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Neel Burton
This article was PROD for reason "Identification of subject and evidence of notability should be provided; no WP article for same" This has been contested and citations provided, but notability remains dubious. (An article on this author was previously discussed and deleted at Wikipedia.) Amazon(UK) quotes what appear to be a couple endorsements rather than independently published editorial reviews. The linked "reviews" are, in order of appearance in the article: a blog, a publication notice consisting of two sentences, and another notice having three. GoogleBooks and GoogleScholar show no indication of notability. — Ningauble 21:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 22:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. At first this seemed a marginal case, but the more I found the less was there. ~ Ningauble 21:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom (and Wikipedia discussion). ~ UDScott 00:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - InvisibleSun 23:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per . Cirt (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)