Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Neethi P.

Neethi P.
A run of the mill lecturer, with no evidence what makes this person notable. Quotes are copyright violations.— Pratap Pandit (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Vote closes: 12:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Neethi was cited in several academic works, like for example:

- Rupert Loup 11:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * https://books.google.com/books?id=Ba8sDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT70
 * https://books.google.com/books?id=wPmNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74
 * https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=W8TgCwAAQBAJ&q=Neethi+P.
 * https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338958812_Review_of_Neethi_P_2016_Globalization_Lived_Locally_A_Labour_Geography_Perspective
 * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41027-018-0147-y
 * https://academic-oup-com.eres.qnl.qa/joeg/article/16/1/93/2412423
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44840819.pdf?seq=1
 * https://scroll.in/article/806968/bengaluru-protests-represent-a-new-wave-of-militant-worker-expression-say-union-leaders
 * Rupert Loup is the creator of this page. Papers published by the person, Passing mentions and one liners don't count as significant coverage. The subject lacks significant coverage in Independent reliable media.--Pratap Pandit (talk) 13:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * When you're putting in your two cents on a VfD it's often customary to disclose any affiliations with the subject i.e. "Keep as creator" dibbydib ⌐■_■ ( barate me ) 04:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. I will have it in mind for the next time. Rupert Loup 09:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: My saying goes that "if an article is on Wikipedia, it might be a good for Wikiquote", and I couldn't find a Wikipedia article on there. From what else I've found, Neethi P is on the ropes of notability right now. dibbydib ⌐■_■ ( barate me ) 04:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge into COVID-19 pandemic in India: subject shouldn't deserve their own article based on notability but quotes from them in another article is more than appreciated. dibbydib ⌐■_■ ( barate me ) 04:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Dibbydib: Wikipedia is not an authority in discern notability, it has a serious problem of systemic bias in coverage. What determine the notability is the she has been reported in several reliable secondary sources, as I demostrate above. Also Neethi not only write about the pandemic and she didn't gain notability because of that. Two Three of the sources that I presented are academic peer reviews of her book Globalization Lived Locally. Also she has been awarded with the Fulbright-Nehru Doctoral and Professional Research Fellowships 2011-12 by the . (p. 4) Rupert Loup 07:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)