Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Orphaned images


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete all.  Cbrown1023  talk  22:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned images
The following images are orphaned and most of them, to my knowledge, have not been used for a long time. Since they are not being used and we currenlty restrict uploads, I propose that we delete these files. Futhermore, some of these images are copyrighted or only used under fair use or have no source/copyright information, giving us two more reasons to delete them. On other WMF wikis, these images would be candidates for speedy deletion, but that is not the case on Wikiquote (there is no need for that policy due to the upload restrictions). That leads us to a VfD for these orphaned images.  Cbrown1023  talk  04:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Antialiased_logo.png
 * Image:DalaiLamawithflowers.jpg
 * Image:Eric_Clapton_Slowhand.jpg
 * Image:Eugene_Debs.jpg
 * Image:Jfkberlinaddress.ogg
 * Image:John_Lennon_Imagine.jpg
 * Image:Lisa_Simpson_Graphs_Happiness_vs_intelligence.jpg
 * Image:Rick_MILLER_vizagxo.jpg
 * Image:Stacey_008.jpg
 * Image:T_ym2.jpg
 * Image:VP_Marshall_with_Pages.jpg
 * Image:Wiki-white.png


 * Vote closes: 05:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all as nom.  Cbrown1023  talk  04:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Perhaps we should upload the free images to Commons first? Koweja 06:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Image:Antialiased_logo.png and Image:Wiki-white.png Your signature with timestampg]] for historical interest; former candidates or could be past logos of the project (Kalki could inform us what they were exactly). --Aphaia 08:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all except two logo images. --Aphaia 08:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Note that we already covered the logos in Votes for deletion archive/Lots and lots of logos, where the consensus was to delete after we transwikied them to Commons, but no one ever found the necessary licensing information to accomplish this. (This remains a pending task). I prefer to hang onto harmless material of historical interest, but if we have no community will or ability to obtain proper licensing, maybe it's best these images are deleted anyway. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Current guideline says "If you propose a new logo for one of a Wikimedia project it must not be licensed under GFDL. Copyright should be transfered to the Wikimedia foundation instead." Our possible problem is those logos submitted in 2003 were older than this policy hence we have no reason to assume this guideline appliable for those logo without explicit agreement of those creators. Just for youf information.Aphaia 11:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I have uploaded all the logo images to Commons and tagged them for speedy deletion here.  Cbrown1023  talk  15:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. ~ UDScott 16:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. - InvisibleSun 22:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.