Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Pratham Sudhir Hegde

Pratham Sudhir Hegde
Fails Notability and WQ:Quotability; probably spam. — Aranya (talk) 16:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Vote closes: 17:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom (and prior PROD designation for same). ~ UDScott (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the purported citations are actual published, verifiable sources. ~ Ningauble (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The following sources I have published are verifiable sources. I am new to wikiquote. So please correct me if I am wrong. Moreover, its not spam and I don't know why you judged my article that way
 * Hi Polymath236, and welcome. Unfortunately, those sources only seem to be websites with user-generated content. When I looked online, I was only able to find sources that are self-published or otherwise unreliable. If you know any reliable sources that would help the page remain, please add them before this discussion closes. Aranya (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Aranya. The sources I have provided which is peoplepill and Twoset's fandom are published and verifiable sources. Peoplepill's articles get checked and verified before they are published. Two Set's fandom is somebody else's fandom. There are strong referrences there also because the article has survived there for eight months without questioning. If you go online, Google does check each of the sources before they are published there. So does many search engines. Otherwise, they wouldn't give featured snippets and knowledge panels to him. If you want citations like newspaper articles, I can give those sources by next week or so but right now, I am not licensed to use some of the links at work according to what I was told. If you have to delete my article and have no other choice, please go on because being new to journalism, its a learning experience to create the best I can. However, please don't judge it as spam ~ Polymath236 02:33, 19 July 2020‎ (UTC)
 * I understand that this can be frustrating, given the work that was put in to write the page. However, Wikiquote's policy on quotability talks about how we need independent and unbiased sources to reliably attribute quotes to the subject. In other words, we need to know if Pratham Hegde actually said them. Anyone can create a page on a Fandom wiki and attribute a quote to someone, so we can't necessarily use sources like that, even if they are true. Infogalactic is an altered fork of English Wikipedia. PeoplePill is a site that scrapes content from other sources, most of which are unreliable. None of these sources help us attribute these quotes to the subject or even show why the page should be included on Wikiquote. Aranya (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, FANDOM wikis are not reliable sources. The other two references linked point to self-published sources as well. dibbydib 23:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is written in the format of many other 'famous people' articles.
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. Rupert Loup 14:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)