Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/SUPERCAT

~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

SUPERCAT
Hoax or private joke. — Ubiquity 21:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 22:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, unremarkable subject. Violates WQ:CRYSTAL as well, even if it isn't a hoax. Google has never heard of "Nathan Stanley Productions" (which should be impossible for any modern company making anything more prominent than YouTube videos) or "David Crackshot" (and I suspect other names listed in the current article). Some names, like SWAT Kats: The Radical Squadron and its staff, are legitimate, but they seem to be either window-dressing to enhance the hoax or perhaps (to assume good faith) folks who are in negotiations for something that is way too premature to be writing about, let alone quoting. WP doesn't have a parallel article (its Super Cat article is about something else entirely). In any case, it seems unsourceable and doesn't belong here at this time. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 23:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jeffq; better done than most hoaxes, but a hoax nevertheless.--Cato 23:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet inclusion criteria now. Seems unlikely that remarkable sourced quotes will be forthcoming; but if it happens, then the entry can be re-created. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 13:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete & speedy would not upset me! -- Herby talk thyme 13:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not saying keep, but it's hilarious. Poetlister 23:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think "hilarious" is grounds for a keep.--Yehudi 15:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, don't be a puritan!--Poetlister 23:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete ~ UDScott 17:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per FloNight.--Yehudi 15:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412 T 23:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)