Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/SeaChange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: keep. I know that it appears to go against the consensus, but given the improvements toward the end of the nomination, which address the issues raised in the nomination, I believe it to be reasonable that the "delete" votes implicitly concurred with the nomination. —LrdChaos (talk) 14:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

SeaChange
This is apparently about an Australian TV drama titled SeaChange. It has only a single quote, without attribution or episode source, that conveys so little information that we can't even be sure about this basic supposition. No intro, no WP or other links, no category — just one bare unattributed quote. One edit from the anonymous creator, then nothing for nearly a month (except our maintenance tagging). Delete unless turned into a proper stub of an article for SeaChange (or whatever it's supposed to be). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 19:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete.  Cbrown1023  talk  18:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Really not worth having.--Poetlister 18:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 23:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep now that the article has been cleaned up and sourced quotes have been added. Koweja 18:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep now. I've changed my nomination vote, per Koweja. I don't feel comfortable executing a speedy-keep because most of our current votes don't say why (e.g., "per nom" or "concur with" someone). Of course, 95% of the time, articles like these are never improved, so one can hardly fault the convenience of a simple delete. (Not that I would ever be so succinct! &#9786;) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.