Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Shane Cody Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: speedy delete. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Shane Cody Johnson
Apparently non-notable person; no worthwhile quotes; I suspect that this is a vanity page. I applied PROD but the creator of the article removed the notice. — Cato 22:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closed early: Result: speedy delete. Clearly not notable. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 17:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: By the editor's own admission, the subject is 13 years old, which seems young for an assertion of notability. The quotes themselves are not interesting, suggesting that it may be some time before the subject attains notability. Furthermore, the quote "I will summon Chuck Norris upon wikiquote for trying to delete this page from whoever made it!" demonstrates that someone is playing around, and the 13 year old "comedian" in question is probably the editor. (Sorry if people feel I should have placed this after the free-form discussion that follows, but honestly it didn't seem to make sense). --Ubiquity 23:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Cato showed extraordinary restraint in not deleting it himself.--Yehudi 09:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Because wikiquote should be for everyone including non-celebrities.


 * The above is by an anon, probably the creator of the article and also User:Sytraxiplague whom I have blocked for 30 days for vandalism.--Cato 22:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I am sytraxiplague's friend, and I believe that you should give himanother chance, and I also beleive that what you did was unfair.


 * This is a 30 day block, not a permanent one. However, please post on WQ:AN if you would like another administrator to review my actions.--Cato 22:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok...if you are an admin, shouldn't you get opinions from other people before you plan to do such actions???
 * Admins are specifically authorized by the community to take such actions based on their own judgment. While anyone is entitled to request a review of such actions at Administrators' noticeboard (WQ:AN), admins are not required to poll others first. Cato's statement is simply informing you of your right to object there (as well as here). As another admin, I have to agree that Sytraxiplague's apparently retributive edits of Cato's user page and vandal-pattern statement about LrdChaos merit a vandal block. You and he (assuming you aren't the same person) clearly do not understand the purpose of Wikiquote (see WQ:WQ and WQ:NOT for some basic information). The community is willing to work with new editors and not bite them — unless they show more interest in attacking than editing, which Sytraxiplague has done. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and permablock. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I wouldn't permablock him myself; 30 days seems right.--Poetlister 15:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 15:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy-delete, unremarkable subject, per Sytraxiplague's description of subject. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.