Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Shannon Smith (HSN)

Shannon Smith (HSN)
This page was already given a PROD tag was removed, but these problems still exist. — UDScott 19:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 20:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. ~ UDScott 19:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete The page has failed Manuel of Style, The page violates Limit of Quotes, the page is spammy, the page is a mess, the page has nothing notable, the page is pointless, the page is violating our blocking policy, the page is not memorial and finally every time there is a VFD the users and admins like InvisibleSun and Eaglestorm are more likely to choose delete for pages like this one.(StarWarsFanBoy 20:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete - Wikipedia shows HSN has around two dozen current hosts and 90 or so previous ones, so it's hard to consider one of them to be uniquely notable enough to quote. Besides, these are non-quotes. They'd be notable if we were in 2250 after World War III, and a Shannon Smith fan video of them was one of the few artifacts left from the 20th century. But not now. Gordonofcartoon 23:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Well what do you know. I knew users and admins were to more likely pick delete for a VFD.(StarWarsFanBoy 00:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC))
 * Comment: That's really not all that surprising - it's not because of any bias, but because most pages that are nominated here are done so for a good reason. By the way, I still fail to understand many of your "reasons" for your votes - particularly the "Manuel of Style" that you always refer to. I also do not see anything "spammy" about the page or anything that has to do with "our blocking policy". I still believe the page should be deleted because of the reasons I cited in the nomination, but not for any of the reasons you give. Continued use of these almost farcical reasons will almost certainly cause your votes to be treated with disdain. ~ UDScott 01:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Are you saying that if I do more Farcical reasons for a vote means my vote is going to be crossed out? Anyway I just want to let you know I only want to get bad pages deleted.(StarWarsFanBoy 03:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC))
 * The whole point is that votes-for-deletion are meant to be based on rational reasons for deletion (or keeping). If you post the same irrelevant nonsense to every vote, it suggests you're not taking the process seriously, and quite rightly your votes should be ignored. Gordonofcartoon 10:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Unmemorable quotes. - InvisibleSun 05:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmemorable quotes. Pmlineditor    ∞    10:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I placed the original PROD tag so I obviously agree that there are no sourced quotes and I question the notability of the subject.--Ole.Holm 19:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced, and quotes are clearly not original to the subject. BD2412 T 02:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trivial, unremarkable, unoriginal banter. ~ Ningauble 18:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: Hey its not my fault users and admins like InvisibleSun and Eaglestorm are more likely to vote delete on pages like this one and besides almost all Admins would more likely vote delete on pages like this one.(StarWarsFanBoy 20:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC))