Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Stele Ely

Stele Ely
This article was previously prod because "No indication of notability. Wikipedia does not have an article on this bard." The tag was removed with the addition of some external links that mention him under one or another alias. Wikipedia still has no article about, or even mentioning, this person or his project. Wikiquote is in the top ten Google hits for the name, which is never a good sign for notability, and GoogleBooks has no mention of him. Although he appears to be recognized as a public person in his community, I do not find any indication of the sort of notability that justifies quoting his work here. — Ningauble (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 18:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. -- Mdd (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly a hoax. I searched individually for about a half dozen of the quotes attributed to this person, and found none of them anywhere except Wikiquote and Wikiquote mirrors. Since these quotes can not be reliably sourced to the author, this is a WQ:QLP violation. BD2412 T 17:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear case of a non-notable person. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 18:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom and BD2412. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, Although I wish this bard were seen to be notable and ecologically important enough to remain, if all (or most) are voting for deletion, then I vote for deletion too. I started the Stele Ely article. I use and love Wikiquote, big thanks to all who keep it clean and relevant. --Greentopia (talk) 18:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be non notable subject matter. -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Possibly marginally notable (we're not bound by Wikipedia necessarily) but the quotes are poor and poorly sourced.--Abramsky (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject does not appear to be objectively quotable and does not seem to possess encyclopedic notability to be exclusively subjectively quotable either. ~ RogDel (talk) 10:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)