Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Stemula


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Stemula
No WP page for this group. Google search yields doubtful notability; but even if they were to be considered a notable group, the quotes are utter drek. - InvisibleSun 22:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Vote closes: 17 February 2007 at 23:00 (UTC)


 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 22:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete --Aphaia 00:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Despite an intro essay that screams "unfamous", I reminded myself (especially after recent rant responses) that we should assume good faith, and checked this out at All Music Guide. No go. I posted a note to the article creator because she doesn't seem to be aware of how easy it is to find the information she claims to be omitting "for privacy". In fact, if I hadn't found out that she's apparently (barely) an adult (along with a good bit of other info, in just 2 minutes of checking), I'd be tempted to blank the article to protect her from unwise exposure. As it is, I've recommended she do this, or ask us to speedy-delete the article. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Jeff.  Cbrown1023  talk  01:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete WP:IAR Tyrenius 03:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 16:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Does WP:IAR apply here? If so, I support Tyrenius.--Poetlister 22:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't recall any time we've ever invoked "ignore all rules", or the more specific w:WP:SNOW ("snowball's chance") in VfDs (except one recent instance where I did just that). We've had such a relatively small VfD participation that we tend to follow the rules more closely than WP. Also, it's possible for a sysop to judge that this meets WQ:SD, but my informal observation is that a sysop registering such a vote (rather than invoking it to close) means they aren't quite comfortable enough to execute such a decision, only to recommend it. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.