Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Synagogue

~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Synagogue
Single quote is unnotable and unsourced. Theme is unlikely to produce many quotes. — Ubiquity 21:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 22:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I have expanded.--Cato 23:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess you proved me wrong on the likelihood of the theme bearing fruit. But in a theme article, can anyone who has something to say on the theme add their thoughts to Unsourced? I am still concerned with the Melanie Axelrod quote. --Ubiquity 00:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Be bold and remove the Melanie Axelrod quote after the VfD finishes, if you want.--Cato 23:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but I'd be inclined to merge and redirect into a general-purpose article on Holy places (e.g. temples, churches, mosques). Cheers! BD2412 T 23:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not merge into buildings?--207.44.254.34 20:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a separate entry for now. Likely can remain a separate entry, but if not enough robust remarkable quotes are found, then it can be merged later. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 13:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Good article now, and an excellent poem by Emma Lazarus.  If people want articles about other sorts of buildings, bring them on. Poetlister 23:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I think this can still be improved significantly. The unique potential is intriguing and I think it should remain separate. But I don't like the unsourced quote however. Modernist 03:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep ~ UDScott 17:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep A good article now.--Yehudi 15:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but delete the unsourced quote. - InvisibleSun 18:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep,--Lookatthis 04:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Nice article now. If we can source the Axelrod, it would be better. --Aphaia 04:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)