Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/TeRra (Magazine)

TeRra (Magazine)
Appears to be spam as part of a xwiki ad campaign. There are two drafts on en.wiki, here and here, one of which has been mostly redacted for copyright violations. Both have been declined as ads. The same user set up a WD item here, but there's no non-English WP articles or any sources available that I can see to suggest that this publication would be notable even if written by a volunteer. Over the course of a couple months there's been about a dozen related images deleted on Commons as copyright violations, which is just incidental, since that's neither here nor there for notability, but only commentary on the xwiki ad efforts. G M G talk  10:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC) User talk:GreenMeansGo hello, I uploaded our media's photos on the wikimedia, an the photo's copyright are possessed by us, and actually we are registered about it to Wikimedia already. But the photo is occurring deletion by wiki but wiki said wait to recover it. So we are waiting. We are public magazine, media company based in New York, and millions subscribers are reading our magazine although it is started since last year.
 * Vote closes: 11:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well Thomashappyday, if your company is willing to release the images according to the instructions at c:COM:CONSENT, then they would be appropriate for inclusion at Commons, and as the company owns the copyright, they are the only ones who may do so. But beyond that, Wikipedia and Wikiquote are not a means for you to promote your company, and you should be aware that attempts to do so are most often entirely transparent to our volunteers, and will most likely just end up wasting a lot of your time.
 * If the company is notable, then independent sources will write about it. If independent sources write about it, then pages on Wikipedia or Wikiquote will eventually be started by a volunteer. Trying to subvert that system mostly just makes it overall less likely in the long run that someone will do that, since it mostly just gives the impression that someone who does is merely complicit in the company's attempts to abuse these projects for the purpose of advertising.  G M G  talk  12:15, 17 August 2018 (UTC)