Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:PGRP

Template:PGRP
Same logic as deleting the related GRP template: Tagging GRP's sockpuppets is just a waste of time. Dedicating a whole template to this also gives him way more attention than necessary, and goes against w:WP:DENY too — Ferien (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete; agree with rationale. Since 2005 he has made probably over ten thousand socks. Seriously, don't bother. Revert, block, ignore them. Also: many of these aren't GRP anyway, they're Wikinger. For obvious reasons I will not reveal in a public place how I can tell. Anyway, w:WP:DENY. Memory hole. Damnatio memoriae. Antandrus (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per w:WP:DENY. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 15:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Waste of time and actively unhelpful per the reasons stated above. The template also appears to be broken. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep I understand deleting the GRP template as it is only used for marking an already banned user, but this one is useful for notify admins to block a user for being a GRP sock. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * We already have a page for notifying administrators about vandalism: it's called WQ:VIP. Creating a userpage to notify admins still gives an LTA way too much attention, especially since the userpage is likely going to remain after that. And it doesn't even serve as a means of notification: an admin can watchlist VIP, but not all existent and non-existent userpages. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)  10:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, delete the page. But, please keep Template:PotentialLTA (should be renamed, though). – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 10:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Vote closes: 16:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)