Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:Worldcat subject


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: '''delete. --Saroj Uprety (talk) 10:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)'''.

Template:Worldcat subject
Per discussion on User talk:Kolja21, this site ceased to exist. — Lemonaka (talk) 17:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Vote closes: 18:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was going to !vote delete ... but ... tracing through what links here indicates Template:Worldcat and Template:Worldcat id may need to be looked at the same time. Haven't got time to do that at the moment. (It might be a tricky or it might be trivial) -- DeirgeDeltac 09:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Trivial: Template:Worldcat id was the basic version of Worldcat author and Worldcat subject. This template is still used (94 items) but should to be deleted as well. (Deleted in enWP already, see w:Template:Worldcat id.) Tricky: Template:Worldcat might be useful if updated, see w:Template talk:WorldCat. --Kolja21 (talk) 03:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: But the link from description see also setction on Worldcat needs to be removed at the same time. Sysop reviewing this should check before closing & executing this VfD. I am now very minded Worldcat id and Worldcat should not be handled within this particular VFD but they should not be forgotten either and I hope to raise discussions/VFD's for these shortly. -- DeirgeDeltac 07:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.