Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Tim Vine

Tim Vine
This recently created page had been given a PROD tag for the reason "Potential copyvio. No sources for jokes." The tag was removed, which brings it here. In our discussion for revised guidelines, it was proposed that a new article with nothing but unsourced quotes would be speedily deleted. Although the discussion has not been completed, we have already been putting some guidelines into effect. If it's agreeable to a consensus here, we could start doing this with new articles having no sourced quotes. - InvisibleSun 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 18:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 17:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 17:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Unless it is radically improved by the end of this VfD period (by which I mean verifiably sourced and trimmed down to no more than five quotes per hour of recording or hundred pages of text cited), Delete. BD2412 T 04:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If the entry is improved with well sourced notable quotes in a manner that is not a copyright violation then the entry can be remain, other wise, delete. I agree with InvisibleSun, that starting this standard now for new articles is for the best. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 12:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with deleting unsourced new pages. It is probably best to use VfD process rather than speedy until people get used to it. (Note that this material was a dump from Wikipedia.) ~ Ningauble 01:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ningauble raised a good point: in transition, it would be better to bring such articles on more visible process, either WQ:VFD or WQ:PROD, even if we would like to make it a WQ:CSD finally. --Aphaia 01:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)